PonyFans.com

Stallion wrote:there's that "running game"

I'm afraid you are right.

I want to see KC

PoconoPony wrote:
He is doing very well. First punt from the end zone was 43 yards. He had a bad shank against Rutgers, but has done a great job on all other punts.

You forget about the one against TCU that got caught up in Fatterson's gravitational pull?

Arkpony wrote:Shear just doesn't have ut

Explains the lack of offers, if he was the real deal we wouldn't have ended up with him.

IIRC most of his punts against RU were very poor

SMU: 7 to Memphis:3 start of q2. Much better start than Rutgers mess.

FriscoChuck wrote:SMU: 7 to Memphis:3 start of q2. Much better start than Rutgers mess.

That's not saying much

Hell of a job by Gilbert evading that sack and delivering a perfect ball to Johnson

Holy [deleted] nice play, almost sacked, then we end up with it at the 1.

TD Shead!

Wow that was easy.

TD SMU

results are better but punting is still a problem.

BigT3x wrote:

PoconoPony wrote:
He is doing very well. First punt from the end zone was 43 yards. He had a bad shank against Rutgers, but has done a great job on all other punts.

You forget about the one against TCU that got caught up in Fatterson's gravitational pull?

You are right, the bad one was TCU.

now that was a big time play by Gilbert under pressure

Haha. I like the announcers stating that it is easy for SMUto score from the 1yard line with a running back like Shead. Did they not study any of the past games?