PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
DanFreibergerForHeisman
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 16486
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
Contact:

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by DanFreibergerForHeisman »

redpony wrote:DFFH- yes, nice article. I was actually referring to selling the decision makers of other conferences on SMU. Obviously the mayor should be on our side as a move to a major conference would help the city as well.

Oh yeah - I totally get your point and agree.

It seems obvious to me someone at SMU was at least involved with the DMN op-ed which is more than anything we have seen in years so maybe (hopefully) it is a start.
Shake It Off Moody
User avatar
BUS
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7315
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Richardson, Tx usa

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by BUS »

For me... if you put Brad Cheves in charge of conference upgrade... it would happen and we would be happy.

2, There are BMD's still. I hear it took some time but we have a couple collectives. Smu can compete.

Win and we will be good.
Peace
Mustang Militia: Fight the good fight"
User avatar
SMU Pom Mom
All-American
All-American
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMU Pom Mom »

SMUvet wrote:You can see the conviction to build based on available seats (students). If you have a large enrollment and a small stadium you don't have the conviction or ability to go bigger. It is unsurprising to see the grouping at the bottom of this table and that they are getting picked last for the team.

I don't know where you got this list, but I can tell you some info is outdated. Last year UNLV upgraded from rickety, remote Sam Boyd Stadium (capacity 40K) to spectacular, indoor, right off the Strip Allegiant Stadium (capacity 65K). By your logic, that's a pretty major commitment to football, and yes, UNLV has been in some conversations, though not as much as SMU.
Dukie
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by Dukie »

SMU Pom Mom wrote:
SMUvet wrote:You can see the conviction to build based on available seats (students). If you have a large enrollment and a small stadium you don't have the conviction or ability to go bigger. It is unsurprising to see the grouping at the bottom of this table and that they are getting picked last for the team.

I don't know where you got this list, but I can tell you some info is outdated. Last year UNLV upgraded from rickety, remote Sam Boyd Stadium (capacity 40K) to spectacular, indoor, right off the Strip Allegiant Stadium (capacity 65K). By your logic, that's a pretty major commitment to football, and yes, UNLV has been in some conversations, though not as much as SMU.

Well, not exactly; Allegiant is ΓÇ£UNLV’sΓÇ¥ stadium as much as Texas Stadium was ΓÇ£SMU’sΓÇ¥ stadium. Home to the Raiders and miles off-campus both lose a lot of points.
User avatar
SMU Pom Mom
All-American
All-American
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMU Pom Mom »

Dukie wrote:
SMU Pom Mom wrote:
SMUvet wrote:You can see the conviction to build based on available seats (students). If you have a large enrollment and a small stadium you don't have the conviction or ability to go bigger. It is unsurprising to see the grouping at the bottom of this table and that they are getting picked last for the team.

I don't know where you got this list, but I can tell you some info is outdated. Last year UNLV upgraded from rickety, remote Sam Boyd Stadium (capacity 40K) to spectacular, indoor, right off the Strip Allegiant Stadium (capacity 65K). By your logic, that's a pretty major commitment to football, and yes, UNLV has been in some conversations, though not as much as SMU.

Well, not exactly; Allegiant is ΓÇ£UNLV’sΓÇ¥ stadium as much as Texas Stadium was ΓÇ£SMU’sΓÇ¥ stadium. Home to the Raiders and miles off-campus both lose a lot of points.

I don't know anything about Texas Stadium, but as a taxpayer who contributed part of the $750 million in public money used to build the stadium on the condition that UNLV gets to play there, I firmly disagree. Also, the stadium is way closer to campus than the old one. Maybe a 10 minute shuttle ride. You can't build a stadium on an urban, landlocked campus--the land doesn't exist. This is as close as you can get. People here consider the location ideal.

Sorry if this sounds defensive, but we Las Vegas folks are always being misunderstood. :lol:
Dukie
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by Dukie »

SMU Pom Mom wrote:
Dukie wrote:Allegiant is ΓÇ£UNLV’sΓÇ¥ stadium as much as Texas Stadium was ΓÇ£SMU’sΓÇ¥ stadium. Home to the Raiders and miles off-campus both lose a lot of points.

I don't know anything about Texas Stadium, but as a taxpayer who contributed part of the $750 million in public money used to build the stadium on the condition that UNLV gets to play there, I firmly disagree. Also, the stadium is way closer to campus than the old one. Maybe a 10 minute shuttle ride. You can't build a stadium on an urban, landlocked campus--the land doesn't exist. This is as close as you can get. People here consider the location ideal.

Sorry if this sounds defensive, but we Las Vegas folks are always being misunderstood. :lol:


Oh no worries, love how passionate you are about your city. But unfortunately the points you raise are beside the point when conferences look at UNLV. Being the little brother in an NFL stadium hurts, and being off-campus hurts.
User avatar
SMUvet
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:42 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMUvet »

Pom Mom, I made the list and used the UNLV website. Maybe I referenced the wrong stadium (Sam Boyd)? Website could be out of date too. I collected the data as efficiently as i could as a fan on a workday. :lol:

Link: https://www.unlv.edu/maps/sbs#:~:text=T ... lled%20for).
User avatar
SMUvet
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:42 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMUvet »

I see what youre saying now. I think UNLV should be removed from the list. The stadium serves the pro team (Raiders) as well.
User avatar
SMUvet
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:42 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMUvet »

The problem with agreeing to keep the Allegiant stadium and juicing the capacity numbers is that it didn't require any conviction from the university to seek financing/fundraise. At least it doesn't appear that it did. it appears it was tax payer raised cash, which is more common for professional stadiums. In other words it doesn't appear the university had to underwrite any real risk.
User avatar
SMU Pom Mom
All-American
All-American
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMU Pom Mom »

Dukie wrote:
SMU Pom Mom wrote:
Dukie wrote:Allegiant is ΓÇ£UNLV’sΓÇ¥ stadium as much as Texas Stadium was ΓÇ£SMU’sΓÇ¥ stadium. Home to the Raiders and miles off-campus both lose a lot of points.

I don't know anything about Texas Stadium, but as a taxpayer who contributed part of the $750 million in public money used to build the stadium on the condition that UNLV gets to play there, I firmly disagree. Also, the stadium is way closer to campus than the old one. Maybe a 10 minute shuttle ride. You can't build a stadium on an urban, landlocked campus--the land doesn't exist. This is as close as you can get. People here consider the location ideal.

Sorry if this sounds defensive, but we Las Vegas folks are always being misunderstood. :lol:


Oh no worries, love how passionate you are about your city. But unfortunately the points you raise are beside the point when conferences look at UNLV. Being the little brother in an NFL stadium hurts, and being off-campus hurts.

Love your passion, too, Dukie! <3 <3 <3.

Actually, what has always hurt us most is that we are Las Vegas. Sin City. It's kind of unbelievable we have an NFL team now when just a few years ago they wouldn't even allow a tourism ad during the Super Bowl because gambling. We are still considered untouchable by a lot of people, even though the mob days are long gone. UNLV isn't exactly Ivy League, either, although we have added a law school, med school, just got R1 research status, and finally got ranked, so things are looking up.

I do think the concerns you mention can go away if attendance climbs a little. I just looked it up and capacity for the lower tier is 27K, with average attendance 22.5K. If they can sell out regularly and maybe open up part of the upper tier, it would send a message,
User avatar
SMU Pom Mom
All-American
All-American
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMU Pom Mom »

SMUvet wrote:The problem with agreeing to keep the Allegiant stadium and juicing the capacity numbers is that it didn't require any conviction from the university to seek financing/fundraise. At least it doesn't appear that it did. it appears it was tax payer raised cash, which is more common for professional stadiums. In other words it doesn't appear the university had to underwrite any real risk.

The stadium was built on UNLV land on a very prime location. Probably worth over $100 mil.
User avatar
SMUvet
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:42 pm

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by SMUvet »

Totally get your point and don't want to take away from UNLV. It is a cool arrangement and seems like a good deal. It took some sweat to get it done. But as i previously said likely an anomaly and should be excluded from the dataset. Getting a little deep in the weeds now but if i assume a $100m PIK contribution to a ~$1.9b project (~5%) it doesn't really seem to meet the typical financial commitment associated for a collegiate facility. It is interesting that Allegiant is one of the most expensive stadiums ever built.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by gostangs »

redpony wrote:DFFH- yes, nice article. I was actually referring to selling the decision makers of other conferences on SMU. Obviously the mayor should be on our side as a move to a major conference would help the city as well.


You are totally out of it apparently. We have several BOT up to their eyeballs on this - flying all over the country plus an extremely well connected consultant working this issue. May or may not be successful but it isn’t because we aren’t working it hard.
User avatar
DanFreibergerForHeisman
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 16486
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
Contact:

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by DanFreibergerForHeisman »

gostangs wrote:We have several BOT up to their eyeballs on this - flying all over the country plus an extremely well connected consultant working this issue. May or may not be successful but it isn’t because we aren’t working it hard.

This is exciting!!!
Shake It Off Moody
panhandle_pony
All-American
All-American
Posts: 621
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Regatta Bay Golf and Yacht Club; Destin, FL

Re: PAC12 Scenario = Expansion

Post by panhandle_pony »

Post Reply