According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

mathman · Post by **mathman** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:15 pm

ColoStang wrote:Asleep at the wheel? Really guy? The idea that our schools leadership is sitting on their hands is 100% laughable...

Exactly. That is the last thing I am worried about.

Nacho · Post by **Nacho** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:21 pm

one of my good friends used to play for asleep at the wheel. could play just about anything but played mainly fiddle and sax.

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:23 pm

Nacho wrote:one of my good friends used to play for asleep at the wheel. could play just about anything but played mainly fiddle and sax.

My father loves them. I just can't get into them.

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:42 pm

Per AD office, no new conference or news to report

ponyscott · Post by **ponyscott** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:46 pm

IS THAT OFFICIAL 94?......lol

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:49 pm

ponyscott wrote:IS THAT OFFICIAL 94?......lol

Yeah, I got a call asking how I am doing with MC recruitment in Austin.

Comet · Post by **Comet** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:57 pm

peruna11 wrote:
@LakenLitman wrote:
...more from #SMU's Orsini: "We remain very optimistic about the emerging opportunities within the unstable college athletics landscape..."

Yet June was pretty down on any prospect. Did the landscape change drastically since then? Does Orsini know something that June doesn't? OR, is Orsini just saying the right things to the media?

Who knows

smubrooks · Post by **smubrooks** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:01 pm

Orsini is just waiting for the green light from the SEC to drop the biggest bomb ever... SMU to SEC!!!!

Nacho · Post by **Nacho** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:25 pm

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/29441038/detail.html

memphis? really memphis?
tulane and memphis?
give me a break.
i don't think we are going to the be but you just cannot take memphis and be taken seriously. this is about football you be nuckleheads.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:28 pm

Nacho wrote:http://www.clickorlando.com/news/29441038/detail.html

memphis? really memphis?
tulane and memphis?
give me a break.
i don't think we are going to the be but you just cannot take memphis and be taken seriously. this is about football you be nuckleheads.

Memphis' athletic director said today that he thinks they deserve to be in the SEC

ColoStang · Post by **ColoStang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:29 pm

Wow, what a stretch of the word "Deserve".

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:31 pm

http://www.wmctv.com/story/15657761/rc- ... =printable

"We want to try to get ourselves in the best possible place," Johnson said. "Ultimately we would like to be in the SEC. That's where we think we belong geographically. We think we deserve to be."

RednBlue11 · Post by **RednBlue11** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:31 pm

NickSMU17 · Post by **NickSMU17** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:32 pm

Can't fault him...we feel and publicized the exact same thing to the big 12...

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:35 pm

NickSMU17 wrote:Can't fault him...we feel and publicized the exact same thing to the big 12...

It's DIVISION ONE FOOTBALL. It's the BIG TWELVE! This isn't SEC!!!!!

According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA