Page 9 of 12
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:13 am
by TidePony
We don't want UAB's

Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:30 am
by mtrout
News release says "it's a pioneering concept" lol. What the F are they thinking?
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:50 am
by mrydel
4 Poles and a tarp? We are paying illegal immigrants too much if they are paying $4,000,000 for 4 Poles.
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 1:57 pm
by mtrout
To be fair, they raised 38mil for football in 1 year. How's our fundraising going?
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:12 pm
by One Trick Pony

No
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:16 pm
by RGV Pony
Off by a factor of ten
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:35 pm
by One Trick Pony
RGV Pony wrote:Off by a factor of ten
I was just going with the four mill
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:48 pm
by RGV Pony
My bad
Re: IPF
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:37 am
by Puckhead48E
I bet UAB's IPF can't even do long division. We ain't got time for that!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: IPF
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 1:10 pm
by NTXCoog
CA Mustang wrote:Yes, I've read several articles on the issue. None of these "honors" is close to having a name on the facility, but at least the first two are a step in the right direction.
When UH announced the change, none of these "honors" were mentioned so it sounds like UH did it to appease the family rather than paying respect to the man who made the facility possible.
Then maybe your current stadium should have been named Ownby. Why was he forgotten when the new stadium was built? Maybe SMU wanted to forget his name since SMU took his donation for a library and built a football stadium instead.
I'm guessing you'll say demolition vs renovation. The changes are quite drastic and not some cosmetic change, but technically you would be correct.
Re: IPF
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 9:24 pm
by One Trick Pony
I'm hoping for a touchdown
Re: IPF
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 11:13 pm
by smusic 00
To coog's point, had the moody foundation not stepped up during the renovation the coliseum would likely have been renamed.
Re: IPF
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 4:06 pm
by smustatesman
smusic 00 wrote:To coog's point, had the moody foundation not stepped up during the renovation the coliseum would likely have been renamed.
Heard the same thing. The powers considered renaming it, "The June Jones Mausoleum"; where other teams come, to be put to rest !
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:57 pm
by Digetydog
NTXCoog wrote:CA Mustang wrote:Yes, I've read several articles on the issue. None of these "honors" is close to having a name on the facility, but at least the first two are a step in the right direction.
When UH announced the change, none of these "honors" were mentioned so it sounds like UH did it to appease the family rather than paying respect to the man who made the facility possible.
Then maybe your current stadium should have been named Ownby. Why was he forgotten when the new stadium was built? Maybe SMU wanted to forget his name since SMU took his donation for a library and built a football stadium instead.
I'm guessing you'll say demolition vs renovation. The changes are quite drastic and not some cosmetic change, but technically you would be correct.
If my family's name was .ownby, I would donate money to demand lush that crumbling piece of ... I am honestly surprised that we were able to bring it up to code in 1989 #collapse
Fired is an entirely new stadium.
Ford us an entirely new stadium.
Re: IPF
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:58 pm
by NTXCoog
Digetydog wrote:NTXCoog wrote:If my family's name was .ownby, I would donate money to demand lush that crumbling piece of ... I am honestly surprised that we were able to bring it up to code in 1989 #collapse
Ford us an entirely new stadium.
And yet the Hofheinz family and foundation were upset about the condition of the basketball arena as stated in their suit, but they weren't willing to provide any funding to maintain/improve it to honor his name. In fact, they wanted money given to them.