PonyFans.com

huskerpony wrote:

smupony94 wrote:Strawberry cough

You going Johnny Jolly on us?

Keepin Austin weird

Dutch wrote:Cheer up. We won 2 games over a 2 year period not long ago

Yes, and most predicted 7-5, just not the same road to get there.

I'm over it - did anyone really expect to win this game?

No

GiddyUp wrote:

Dutch wrote:Cheer up. We won 2 games over a 2 year period not long ago

Yes, and most predicted 7-5, just not the same road to get there.

I'm over it - did anyone really expect to win this game?

I actually emailed into a radio show this week imploring everyone not to listen to the bookie they had on who told everyone to bet on SMU. He said he was picking SMU to cover because of Zach Line. Obviously hadn't done his research very well.

In fact I thought it would be a massive blowout

cougar high won against sm jr high.

ShastaNation wrote:Ah yes Tulsa, Coog High's first opponent of the season without a scrub at QB.

Wow tough guy!!

If you knew what was best for your school then you would support UH. You do realize that in all likelihood we are both going to join the Big East, and in order for the Big East to retiain AQ status certain requirements must be met? The better that non-AQ teams perform such as SMU - Boise - SMU the more likely that the Big East retains their AQ status.[/quote]


AND since CUSA equally shares bowl revenue we make just as much as UH if you make it to a BCS game[/quote]


Exactly, no need for hate at this point. Lets both better our schools and stick it to the other TX schools (Baylor specifically). Coog High, ROI, and whatever else comments are fair game. No quarrel.

It's the insensitive / racial comments from sbsmith that are unnecessary.[/quote]

we ignore him, so should you

Ok.