Page 2 of 5

Re: SMU vs UNT announced

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:32 pm
by MeanGreenGem
Hoop Fan wrote:surely, I am not the first person to notice that SMU has agreed to play UNT in 2006 in Denton and at Ford in 2007. Where is our Green friend?


Bring out the co-eds! It's showtime!;)

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:45 pm
by MrMustang1965
The coeds at Texas Women's University and UNT don't compare to our coeds at SMU. This contest will EASILY be won by the Mustangs!

Re:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:47 pm
by MeanGreenGem
MrMustang1965 wrote:The coeds at Texas Women's University and UNT don't compare to our coeds at SMU. This contest will EASILY be won by the Mustangs!


W-R-O-N-G ! ! ! ! ! :)

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:54 pm
by BUS
Those are not REAL women at Texas Womens University.
Watch out.

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 7:10 pm
by Charleston Pony
I agree this is a series that should be played, if not EVERY YEAR like TCU, then at least on a rotating basis with Baylor (if we could get that arrangement). I still like the idea of a Metroplex Mayors' Trophy with SMU/TCU/UNT playing each other and the trophy going to anyone who can sweep the series. Games with these 3 schools are good for 25,000 crowds and have minimal travel expenses.

Re:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 7:46 pm
by JayM
Charleston Pony wrote:I agree this is a series that should be played, if not EVERY YEAR like TCU, then at least on a rotating basis with Baylor (if we could get that arrangement). I still like the idea of a Metroplex Mayors' Trophy with SMU/TCU/UNT playing each other and the trophy going to anyone who can sweep the series. Games with these 3 schools are good for 25,000 crowds and have minimal travel expenses.


Careful CP talking sense can get ya in trouble :roll:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:37 pm
by RGV Pony
Let's see...2006. Our plan is for that to be the year all of our prospects blossom & come full circle. How nice would it be if something actually came to fruition...the offense clicks, the defense resembles a Bennett defense & Darrell Dickey is standing with his arms crossed at the wrong end of a 52-3 whipping?

A guy can dream, can't he?

Re:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:55 pm
by MeanGreenGem
BUS wrote:Those are not REAL women at Texas Womens University.
Watch out.


TWU: Where men are men and women are too. :lol:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:16 pm
by Diamond Girl
MGG, you shouldn't have opened the door on that one. You better duck - the stuff is going to hit the fan now. :roll:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:51 pm
by SWC2010
Playing UNT for 2 years is a no brainer. It should be a "W". If we can't beat 'em-- perhaps it's time to join D-II.

But with that W in 2006, Northwestern & Wake offer a reasonable 'chance' to open 3-0. Who cares about the $$ side (attendance) when you have a shot to enter conference @ 3-0.

Recruits come to winning programs... Fans attend winning programs... He!!, current SMU students might even attend the games.

Re:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:56 pm
by JayM
SWC2010 wrote:Playing UNT for 2 years is a no brainer. It should be a "W". If we can't beat 'em-- perhaps it's time to join D-II.

But with that W in 2006, Northwestern & Wake offer a reasonable 'chance' to open 3-0. Who cares about the $$ side (attendance) when you have a shot to enter conference @ 3-0.

Recruits come to winning programs... Fans attend winning programs... He!!, current SMU students might even attend the games.


What D-II conference do you plan on joining? :lol:

Re:

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:58 pm
by MrMustang1965
MeanGreenGem wrote:
MrMustang1965 wrote:The coeds at Texas Women's University and UNT don't compare to our coeds at SMU. This contest will EASILY be won by the Mustangs!


W-R-O-N-G ! ! ! ! ! :)
MGM: How many UNT coeds and/or alumni have been featured in Playboy Magazine and how many SMU coeds and/or alumni have been featured in Playboy Magazine? I rest my case.

Re:

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:23 am
by SWC2010
JayM wrote:
SWC2010 wrote:Playing UNT for 2 years is a no brainer. It should be a "W". If we can't beat 'em-- perhaps it's time to join D-II.

But with that W in 2006, Northwestern & Wake offer a reasonable 'chance' to open 3-0. Who cares about the $$ side (attendance) when you have a shot to enter conference @ 3-0.

Recruits come to winning programs... Fans attend winning programs... He!!, current SMU students might even attend the games.


What D-II conference do you plan on joining? :lol:


WOW, JM, that's making a big assumption...

Hmmm, if such tragedy would occur, I guess that would be a "SunBelt-type Conference", wouldn't it? 8)

Re:

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:50 am
by overcusser
MrMustang1965 wrote:
MeanGreenGem wrote:
MrMustang1965 wrote:The coeds at Texas Women's University and UNT don't compare to our coeds at SMU. This contest will EASILY be won by the Mustangs!


W-R-O-N-G ! ! ! ! ! :)
MGM: How many UNT coeds and/or alumni have been featured in Playboy Magazine and how many SMU coeds and/or alumni have been featured in Playboy Magazine? I rest my case.


I have no idea how many UNT coeds/alumni have appeared in Playboy, obviously you must think SMU must have had more. I do know that UNT has produced quite a few Miss Texas' and at least one Miss America.... So what does that say, I guess that both school are blessed with a fair share of beauties but the SMUers are more disposed to take off there clothes for public viewing........CLASSY

Re:

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:59 am
by PK
SWC2010 wrote:Playing UNT for 2 years is a no brainer. It should be a "W". If we can't beat 'em-- perhaps it's time to join D-II.

But with that W in 2006, Northwestern & Wake offer a reasonable 'chance' to open 3-0. Who cares about the $$ side (attendance) when you have a shot to enter conference @ 3-0.

Recruits come to winning programs... Fans attend winning programs... He!!, current SMU students might even attend the games.
FYI According to the report in this mornings paper, both Wake and Northwestern have been removed from our future schedules.