Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:39 am
by The PonyGrad
BUTitan wrote:I really can't see how SMU is ranked over BU. Both of us went 5-6, but SMU is in a much weaker conference and BU beat you at your HOME!!! Man I can't wait to beat TCU next year to boost our ratings.
P.S. Don't get me wrong I think SMU could beat BU if we played today.
Geez, one place different? Why worry about it?
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:43 am
by PonyPride
BUTitan wrote:I really can't see how SMU is ranked over BU. Both of us went 5-6, but SMU is in a much weaker conference and BU beat you at your HOME!!! Man I can't wait to beat TCU next year to boost our ratings.
P.S. Don't get me wrong I think SMU could beat BU if we played today.
To be honest, I've never liked Baylor much. But I'll be a big BU fan when your guys line up against TCU!
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:00 pm
by DixieTech
Agreed. Admittedly, TCU is fast -- really fast -- and better than I'd like to admit. However, out of the other 24 teams on that list, if they played on a neutral field, I'd bet on the Frogs against:
UCLA, Wisconsin (maybe), Texas Tech (definitely) and Cal. Oklahoma would beat them in a re-match.
We would pound the frogs this year. We pounded them last year, and we will pound them next year in Ft.Worth with a partisan Tech crowd. Just a comment.
Their win over ISU was a good one though, although ISU is not exactly a powerhouse in the XII.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:17 pm
by BUTitan
I honestly think this TCU team could be the most overated team in the history of college football. I mean they are better than Baylor and all but top 10? Come on they barely beat ISU.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:22 pm
by Buckethead
At this point in SMU football history no team that we beat should be in the top 10.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:59 pm
by SMUstang
SMU Football Blog wrote:SMU is ranked above four of the six teams it lost, too.
On the other hand, SMU is ranked lower than 4 of the teams it beat. TCU, UTEP, UAB, and Houston.
Go figure
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:03 pm
by SMUstang
SMUstang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:SMU is ranked above four of the six teams it lost, too.
On the other hand, SMU is ranked lower than 4 of the teams it beat. TCU, UTEP, UAB, and Houston.
Go figure
Is the glass half full or half empty?
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:18 pm
by LonghornFan68
SMUstang wrote:SMUstang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:SMU is ranked above four of the six teams it lost, too.
On the other hand, SMU is ranked lower than 4 of the teams it beat. TCU, UTEP, UAB, and Houston.
Go figure
Is the glass half full or half empty?
I dunno, but it's a weird statistic nonetheless.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:01 pm
by smulite
I agree that TCU has to be the most overrated team in NCAA history, And I'm glad to see that VA Tech is ranked 3rd in that pole.