Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:09 pm
by expony18
SMU Football Blog wrote:expony18 wrote:Blog... best point you made, and I agree 100% with it, is that SMU will pay more for the next coach then they did for PB.
If that is the best point I made, I am going to quit
well that would be twice in one season... very impressive
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:52 pm
by mavsrage311
I enjoyed reading the 5 questions, well done blog
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:03 am
by JesuitPony
Good call on the search firm, Blog. From Kate the Greek's Monday morning article:
SMU will use the Plano search firm Eastman & Beaudine, as it has with past openings.
http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/colleges/smu/stories/102907dnsposmuorsini.36cd15b.html
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:38 am
by BrianTinBigD
I also agree on the stupid Katie the Greek comments. The SMU athletic budget shortfall is just paper money anyways since the Athletic Department gets to pick up the full costs for the scholarships they give. They really just using up extra spasce in classes froma tuition perspective.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:57 am
by jtstang
I too am psyched by the triumphant return of the blog. It's about time we had something triumphant associated with SMU football.
One thought, though. If the process of finding a coach takes as long as you seem to think it will, given the intent of waiting until the season ends to interview other candidates, doesn't that squander the "head start" Orsini got by firing Bennett this early?