If SMU were to play...

SMUer · Post by **SMUer** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:40 pm

I think SMU would roll...until 2 min left in the 4th quarter

Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex · Post by **Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:45 pm

IknowSports wrote:I know I probably should not be throwing out this hypothetical situation...but I was talking about it with a few friends...

What would the score be if this years SMU football team were to play this years SouthLake Carol on a neutral field????

Your honest thoughts...

I think Carol would have a problem against SMU. I mean, she'd be going 1 on 11.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:07 pm

Maybe she could get Allen to come help her.

MustangStealth · Post by **MustangStealth** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:09 pm

Or at least Katy. I've heard she's better anyways.

SMU Kilmer · Post by **SMU Kilmer** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:09 pm

SMU 62
SLC 10

Dodge would pick apart Lindley & Co. No one could cover Cantu. (Oregon Commit).

Alaric · Post by **Alaric** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:09 pm

78-0 by halftime sounds about right.

SLC has 8 guys showing up in Rivals where we've probably got 60 guys on our roster that showed up there their senior year, they're younger and there's a big difference between 17-18 year old versus 20-22 year olds, they'd be outweighed by a lot at almost every position - especially in the lines, better coaching believe it or not, much less depth. After their D1 prospects, they'd have intramural type guys, especially on special teams. What else? Our guys would be a lot more experienced. Look at a guy like Youri Yenga, they played SLC last year and he was really disruptive. He's shown he's got some real talent but a year later, stronger and better coached and he's just a regular ole guy on our team.

SMU Kilmer · Post by **SMU Kilmer** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:11 pm

You're right we did have 60 guys on the roster that were on Rivals, but If we could recruit someone other than a 2 or 3-A all-stater things might be different.

J.T.supporta · Post by **J.T.supporta** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:18 pm

SMU Kilmer wrote:You're right we did have 60 guys on the roster that were on Rivals, but If we could recruit someone other than a 2 or 3-A all-stater things might be different.

But why would we want to do that...were SMU football remember

IknowSports · Post by **IknowSports** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:20 pm

I want coach Bud Kilmer next year...he knows what it takes to win..he knows sacrafice. He runs a tight ship and doesnt take any BS.

Tonight we play Bingville....Tonight we beat Bingville

IknowSports · Post by **IknowSports** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:22 pm

Maybe SMU could beat SLC, but no way they beat West Canan...even if Mox was starting because Lance harbor was hurt.

J.T.supporta · Post by **J.T.supporta** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:26 pm

IknowSports wrote:Maybe SMU could beat SLC, but no way they beat West Canan...even if Mox was starting because Lance harbor was hurt.

HS team vs. CFB team is the most pointless discussion ever....TWO DIFFERENT SPORTS, TWO DIFFERENT STYLES...

Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex · Post by **Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:38 pm

MustangStealth wrote:Or at least Katy. I've heard she's better anyways.

Haha...Katy did manage to beat Carol the last time they met.

jtstang · Post by **jtstang** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:41 pm

Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote:
MustangStealth wrote:Or at least Katy. I've heard she's better anyways.

Haha...Katy did manage to beat Carol the last time they met.

Come on now, it doesn't matter who wins--the important thing is that Katy and Carol are playing with each other.

MustangStealth · Post by **MustangStealth** » Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:08 pm

jtstang wrote:Come on now, it doesn't matter who wins--the important thing is that Katy and Carol are playing with each other.

In that situation everybody wins

If SMU were to play...

Re: If SMU were to play...