Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:47 pm
Junior wrote:Of course people in Idaho are rich. What the heck can you spend your money on there?
Spud cannons for the whole family?
Spud cannons for the whole family?
Page 2 of 2
Spud cannons for the whole family?
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:47 am
BrentMusburger wrote:mustangbill67 wrote:Although I have not had the opportunity to spend some time there, I understand that if you are into outdoor activities (backpacking, climbing, fishing,etc) Idaho has a lot to offer. It is on my list of places to adventure in.
Go to Montana instead
The panhandle--does that qualify as a panhandle? I don't know--anyway, the skinny part at the top is great if you're into the outdoors and Coeur d'Alene is a pretty cool town. The rest of the state just has potatoes and mormons.
But I agree, Montana is much better.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:17 pm
Junior wrote:Paladin wrote:Why no love for Idaho on ponyfans.com?
"Idaho, however, with 26.65 millionaires per 1,000 population, has the highest per capita ratio of any state, largely because of the soaring price of land on its many large farms. Maine, a longtime retreat of the rich, is second with 7.72 millionaires per 1,000, while North Dakota, with its sprawling farms and ranches, is third with 6.9. The states with the lowest concentrations of seven-figure citizens: Arkansas, with .34 millionaires per 1,000, and Wyoming, where the ratio is just .19. Nonetheless, to reverse Scott Fitzgerald's famous dictum, just about everywhere the rich are becoming less and less distinguishable from everyone else."
Of course people in Idaho are rich. What the heck can you spend your money on there?
Taking Jr's logic a step further, Lubbock must be wall-to-wall millionaires...