Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:58 pm
no[/quote]One Trick Pony wrote:
That's what she said
[/quote] That's what she said
[/quote] Page 2 of 2
That's what she said
[/quote] Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:27 am
SMU Hockey 2010 wrote:expony18 wrote:noSilk wrote:If the season started today, it would be Logan Turner, since he had a full spring working with Coach Jones and his staff. Shouldn't he (and Braden Smith, at least) be included in the poll?
I feel like this thread is leaving out one important concept for quarterback usefulness - chemistry.
J-Will, like him or not, has two seasons with these boys under his belt. Sure, he's been with a different coach in a different system, but knowing the dudes you're playing with counts for a lot. missing three weeks of spring football, while obviously a big deal, is less important to chemistry, I feel, than having a feel for the squad in gametime.
How many of his boys do you think he'll be playing with? Bo may have the advantage by the number of players coming in this year that he will be throwing to, all JJ recruits.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:56 pm
pony warrior wrote:SMU Hockey 2010 wrote:expony18 wrote:noSilk wrote:If the season started today, it would be Logan Turner, since he had a full spring working with Coach Jones and his staff. Shouldn't he (and Braden Smith, at least) be included in the poll?
I feel like this thread is leaving out one important concept for quarterback usefulness - chemistry.
J-Will, like him or not, has two seasons with these boys under his belt. Sure, he's been with a different coach in a different system, but knowing the dudes you're playing with counts for a lot. missing three weeks of spring football, while obviously a big deal, is less important to chemistry, I feel, than having a feel for the squad in gametime.
How many of his boys do you think he'll be playing with? Bo may have the advantage by the number of players coming in this year that he will be throwing to, all JJ recruits.
That's a good question. I can say Sanders, Butler, Martin, Zimmerman, Lobo, Enright and Poynter. But there are a whole bunch of FRs in that spring football depth chart, so your point's valid.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:02 pm
smu diamond m wrote:I don't think the team had any chemistry last year.
I don't know... I think Melting Down does require some sort of Chemisty.
-CoS
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:29 pm
Silk wrote:If the season started today, it would be Logan Turner, since he had a full spring working with Coach Jones and his staff.
Totally wrong. JJs not [deleted] or high like you might have been when this post was made. how many snaps has Turner taken in NCAA?
Advantage Willis
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:10 am
Jeff George
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:29 am
I think Tony Romo's got the position locked up.
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:46 pm
Gary Marangi