Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:03 pm
The new unis looked sharp!!!
SMU Fan Site
http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/
ALEX LIFESON wrote:The new unis looked sharp!!!
FWMustangGirl wrote:So none of you took a camera phone with you?
BIGHORSE wrote:ALEX LIFESON wrote:The new unis looked sharp!!!
Yeah they did!!!
well does that make a lot of sense? Aren't we wearing white against Rice?expony18 wrote:ive already seen a drawing, and honestly i think i want to be surprised next friday
iam excited about home and away.... i already have the white helmet in my living room so thats not a surprise anywaysDooby wrote:well does that make a lot of sense? Aren't we wearing white against Rice?expony18 wrote:ive already seen a drawing, and honestly i think i want to be surprised next friday
Oh I have no problem picking the correct school colors. It is SMU that seems to have the problem. The colors shown on the Public Affairs site are the closest to correct, but the pms numbers they list are not correct for the colors shown. The marketing colors are terrible, but at least the pms numbers match what they are displaying. Remind me of the color of party balloons.jtstang wrote:NavyCrimson wrote:mrydel: PK may have a stroke if he sees the actual uniform. He has been hyperventilating just on the color discussion.
I'm with PK on this one.
Is it "Tulsa" blue?
How can you be with PK, when PK can't decide which of the 14 different marketing samples of blue on various smu.edu pages he's adopting?
PK wrote: I still think it is sad and pathetic that no one seems to be bothered by the fact that SMU's original school colors have been allowed to be reduced to simple generic red and blue with no meaning or purpose other than some marketing genius liked the colors.