Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:30 pm
by 03Mustang
Now they are saying 15 of the positives were for recreational drug use. So much for their endless stash of jokes about SMU's recreational drug problem.
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:10 pm
by Dooby
CalallenStang wrote:Players who fail a drug test must attend drug counseling and are subject to additional tests. A second offense results in a suspension, additional testing and mandatory counseling. A third offense leads to a suspension from the team while he undergoes a rehabilitation program.
A fourth offense results in a player being dismissed from the team and having his scholarship revoked.
Why doesn't the first offense result in a suspension? Why doesn't the second offense lead to a suspension from the team? Why doesn't the third offense result in dismissal?
The first offense is a slap on the wrist. Hardly a deterrent to those who want to use drugs.
Let us ...uh....not ....uh.....talk about suspensions after the first test. OK? You really might not like where that road leads. Even at SMU. Just sayin'.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:00 am
by Oldmins
03Mustang wrote:LA_Mustang wrote:ANOTHER thread on the SMU board dedicated to UNT football
The obsession continues....
Maybe so - but at least we know there's another program out there with problems far beyond what we're dealing with. At least SMU football has some positive things going for it...if you're an NTSU grad driving home from a hard double shift at the 7-11 tonight, what can you be happy about with your football team? A new stadium....maybe?
Hey, is there really anything wrong with doing a double shift at the 7-11? Some of us forget that there are people working out there on our behalf, and the kind of snobbery this comment shows doesn't really do SMU much good.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:09 am
by jtstang
Oldmins wrote:03Mustang wrote:LA_Mustang wrote:ANOTHER thread on the SMU board dedicated to UNT football
The obsession continues....
Maybe so - but at least we know there's another program out there with problems far beyond what we're dealing with. At least SMU football has some positive things going for it...if you're an NTSU grad driving home from a hard double shift at the 7-11 tonight, what can you be happy about with your football team? A new stadium....maybe?
Hey, is there really anything wrong with doing a double shift at the 7-11?
No, and there's nothing wrong with making a joke about NTSU either. Especially a joke about blackballing them from every good conference they've ever tried to get into in a huge conspiracy to keep them down.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:15 am
by smupony94
jtstang wrote:Oldmins wrote:03Mustang wrote:LA_Mustang wrote:ANOTHER thread on the SMU board dedicated to UNT football
The obsession continues....
Maybe so - but at least we know there's another program out there with problems far beyond what we're dealing with. At least SMU football has some positive things going for it...if you're an NTSU grad driving home from a hard double shift at the 7-11 tonight, what can you be happy about with your football team? A new stadium....maybe?
Hey, is there really anything wrong with doing a double shift at the 7-11?
No, and there's nothing wrong with making a joke about NTSU either. Especially a joke about blackballing them from every good conference they've ever tried to get into in a huge conspiracy to keep them down.
I support you JT
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:37 am
by jtstang
Lose that avatar or I will make you ambassador to Denton.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:43 am
by smupony94
jtstang wrote:Lose that avatar or I will make you ambassador to Denton.
Done
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:04 pm
by Corp
Billy Joe wrote:
N. Texas is in a less visable conference than SMU.
hummm...too close to call.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:08 pm
by jtstang
Corp wrote:Billy Joe wrote:
N. Texas is in a less visable conference than SMU.
hummm...too close to call.
Come on, don't take away all we have.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:34 pm
by ponyangel
Do you think Riley Dodge regrets not going to Texas?????
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:37 pm
by 03Mustang
Corp wrote:Billy Joe wrote:
N. Texas is in a less visable conference than SMU.
hummm...too close to call.
Both are lower-tier but C-USA has the TV contract with ESPN and several more bowl ties...the winner of the Suck Belt goes to the New Orleans Bowl. 6-6 Rice played in that 2 years ago after finishing 4th in C-USA.
We're not in a great conference, but it's far and away better than what NTSU has.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:24 pm
by that's great raplh
tset
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:11 pm
by SmooBoy
03Mustang wrote:Corp wrote:Billy Joe wrote:
N. Texas is in a less visable conference than SMU.
hummm...too close to call.
Both are lower-tier but C-USA has the TV contract with ESPN and several more bowl ties...the winner of the Suck Belt goes to the New Orleans Bowl. 6-6 Rice played in that 2 years ago after finishing 4th in C-USA.
We're not in a great conference, but it's far and away better than what NTSU has.
These comments should go into the 'Season Lows' thread. We are grasping.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:27 pm
by Oldmins
What has the world come to when the big debate is which ranks higher, North Texas State Teachers College or Southern Methodist University?
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:36 pm
by smupony94
Oldmins wrote:What has the world come to when the big debate is which ranks higher, North Texas State Teachers College or Southern Methodist University?
The end is nigh