Page 2 of 2
Re: Potts it is...
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:02 am
by The PonyGrad
With a QB decision as close as this it was going to create controversy regardless.
This is the quote I like:
Sheffield has speed Potts does not have. Last season, he could escape collapsing pockets and make much better throws on the run than Potts.
Bring on the blitzes!
Re: Potts it is...
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:17 am
by Treadway21
The PonyGrad wrote:With a QB decision as close as this it was going to create controversy regardless.
This is the quote I like:
Sheffield has speed Potts does not have. Last season, he could escape collapsing pockets and make much better throws on the run than Potts.
Bring on the blitzes!
"ALL OUT!" ?
Re: Potts it is...
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:31 pm
by KillBilly
Junior wrote:raiderpower seems split over the potts decision. they get pretty nasty over there. some posters seem to question others allegiance for even suggesting that sheffield may be better.
very dysfunctional group over there...
Tech fans love a good argument. We're not so much a dysfunctional family, as we are a loving but loud-mouthed Italian or Greek family.
Bring on the blitzes [deleted]. Our 2010 OL can take it!
Re: Potts it is...
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:52 pm
by The PonyGrad
KillBilly wrote:Junior wrote:raiderpower seems split over the potts decision. they get pretty nasty over there. some posters seem to question others allegiance for even suggesting that sheffield may be better.
very dysfunctional group over there...
Tech fans love a good argument. We're not so much a dysfunctional family, as we are a loving but loud-mouthed Italian or Greek family.
Bring on the blitzes [deleted]. Our 2010 OL can take it!
Bulletin board material guys. Tech fans call you [deleted]!
Re: Potts it is...
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:23 pm
by SMUfiji43
KillBilly wrote:
Bring on the blitzes [deleted]. Our 2010 OL can take it!
You mean these guys? Consider me unimpressed....
Re: Potts it is...
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:21 pm
by cutter
"Taylor Potts not on tight leash, Steven Sheffield can still get in games"
http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com ... s-not.htmlI'm thinking this can't be a good thing for either Potts or Sheffield -- and, they probably don't feel good about it. all of which is good for us, I think.
Re: Potts it is...
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:31 pm
by GeorgiaMustang
Treadway21 wrote:The PonyGrad wrote:With a QB decision as close as this it was going to create controversy regardless.
This is the quote I like:
Sheffield has speed Potts does not have. Last season, he could escape collapsing pockets and make much better throws on the run than Potts.
Bring on the blitzes!
"ALL OUT!" ?
How about "Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!"