Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:25 am
that's what Thad's liver is going to look like if he keeps pounding the JIW 
Page 2 of 4
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:31 am
Thad and HBPD cloned themselves years ago so they would have readily available lives when their current ones fail
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:56 am
Mestengo wrote:Kyle has one interception, and only 4 touch downs what ? KP: Comp 48, Att 70, Yards 725, TDs 4, Int 1. What am I missing here?
I beleive those are KP's stats through game 9 last year.
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:31 am
PK wrote:Mestengo wrote:Kyle has one interception, and only 4 touch downs what ? KP: Comp 48, Att 70, Yards 725, TDs 4, Int 1. What am I missing here?
I beleive those are KP's stats through game 9 last year.
that is correct PK.
I was simply trying to point out the top contributors from 2009 v. 2010, and since BLM was injured I had to use padron's stats as well
and for what its worth since someone asked about the 4th leading receiver through 9 games
2009
COle Beasley: Receptions 22 , Yards 283, TDs 2
2010
Bradley Haynes: Receptions 26, Yards 260, TDs 2
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:35 am
How many fewer defensive turnovers has the 2010 defense created?
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:45 am
McAndless wrote:How many fewer defensive turnovers has the 2010 defense created?
i think we're now at -10 or -11. last year at this time we were at +3 or more. (according to Jones we were +3 going into game 9 in 2009, and this year we were -8.)
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:47 am
Jones talked about it on the Climb last night. I forgot the exact number but I think last year at this point we were around +3 and this year we are -3.
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:57 am
So does this mean that the universe could all be in the atom of ones fingernail?
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:05 pm
mrydel wrote:Jones talked about it on the Climb last night. I forgot the exact number but I think last year at this point we were around +3 and this year we are -3.
2010 through 9 games
INT RETURNS: SMU 6 v. Opp 8
FUMBLES Recovered: SMU 4 v. Opp. 11
SMU -9
http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... mcume.html
2009 thorugh 9 games
INT RETURNS: SMU 15 v. Opp 11
FUMBLES Recovered: SMU 10 v. Opp. 11
SMU + 3
http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... amgbg.html
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:20 pm
also.....
Blocked Kicks through 9 games 2009
SMU: 8
Opp:1
Blocked Kick in 2010
SMU: 6
Opp: 0
Blocked Kicks through 9 games 2009
SMU: 8
Opp:1
Blocked Kick in 2010
SMU: 6
Opp: 0
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:22 pm
ThadFilms wrote:I like turtles. Bow ties are cool... and so are these stats.
(Just imagine how much more prolific the passing offense could be if ol' expony18 were lining up, errr... riding pine for this team! ... You know I love ya' ex p and I am only kidding. Maybe you and I can ride the pine together at the ol' Marina Pub some day, I'm here for one of my last two nights - be back Saturday for the SMU game - before returning to Tejas.)
just saw this...
i will be south of the border this weekend. shots of patron at the marshall game!Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:19 pm
expony18 wrote:mrydel wrote:Jones talked about it on the Climb last night. I forgot the exact number but I think last year at this point we were around +3 and this year we are -3.
2010 through 9 games
INT RETURNS: SMU 6 v. Opp 8
FUMBLES Recovered: SMU 4 v. Opp. 11
SMU -9
http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... mcume.html
2009 thorugh 9 games
INT RETURNS: SMU 15 v. Opp 11
FUMBLES Recovered: SMU 10 v. Opp. 11
SMU + 3
Well I knew there was a 3 in there somewhere.
http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... amgbg.html
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:21 pm
Holding a 5-4 record with a minus-9 turnover ratio is amazing and really hard to do.
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:25 pm
George S. Patton wrote:Holding a 5-4 record with a minus-9 turnover ratio is amazing and really hard to do.
Aye Aye Captain. I'd love to see an INT or two vs. UTEP. A TAINT (TD after an INT) would make my day.
Re: 2009 v. 2010 Comparison through 9 games
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:41 pm
expony18 wrote:*disclaimer* if you don't like statistics or facts please stop reading now... or if you think the offense has regressed from last year please keep reading...
QB
BLM: Comp 149, Att 266, Yards 1725, TDs 12, Int 10
KP: Comp 48, Att 70, Yards 725, TDs 4, Int 1
2009 Total: Comp 197, Att 336, 2450 Yards, TDs 16, Int 11
2010 Total: Comp 195, Att 332, 2490 Yards, TDs 22, Int 8
Top 2 RB's
2009
McNeal: Carries 160, Yards 727, Avg. 4.53, Long 49, Tds 5
Line: Carries 37, Yards 111, Avg. 3.0, Long 11, Tds 4
2010
Line: Carries 138, Yards 918, Avg, 6.7, Long 36, Tds 7
Padron: Carries 67, Yards 254, Avg, 3.8, Long 24, Tds 2
2009 Total: Carries 197, Yards 838, Avg. 4.25, Long 49, Tds 9
2010 Tota: Carries 205, Yards 1172, Avg, 5.71, Long 36, Tds 9
2010
Top 3 WR's
2009
ES: Receptions 70,Yards 843, Avg. 12.04, TDs 3
AR: Receptions 30, Yards 530, Avg. 17.66, TDs 4
Wilkerson: Receptions 30, Yards 409, Avg. 13.63, Tds 4
2010
AR: Receptions 41, Yards 863, Avg. 21, TDs 9
CB: Receptions 55, Yards 718, Avg. 13.1, TDs 5
DJ: Receptions 53, Yards 527, Avg. 9.9, Tds 5
2009 Total: Receptions 130, Yards 1782, Avg. 13.7, Tds 11
2010 Total: Receptions 149, Yards 2108, Avg. 14.15, Tds 19
shhhhuuuusssshhh don't tell anyone!
actually good work...