Page 2 of 2
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:10 pm
by Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex
Trade Legos for Tattoos?
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:59 pm
by gostangs
How about the "Yield to SEC" division and the "not as good as we used to be" division.
Or the "unsolvable unemployment" division and the "unions distroyed our town" division?
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:04 pm
by pwnyxpress
gostangs wrote:
Or the "unsolvable unemployment" division and the "unions distroyed our town" division?
I think we're getting somewhere here.... "Union's" and "Mafia's"
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:14 pm
by Mitch McConnell
gostangs wrote:How about the "Yield to SEC" division and the "not as good as we used to be" division.
Or the "unsolvable unemployment" division and the "unions distroyed our town" division?
I'm for the Ulysses S. Grant "We finished your [deleted] off" division
and
The William Tecumseh Sherman Division "Burn, baby, Burn" division
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:07 pm
by HB Pony Dad
Mitch McConnell wrote:gostangs wrote:How about the "Yield to SEC" division and the "not as good as we used to be" division.
Or the "unsolvable unemployment" division and the "unions distroyed our town" division?
I'm for the Ulysses S. Grant "We finished your [deleted] off" division
and
The William Tecumseh Sherman Division "Burn, baby, Burn" division
While we were Marching Through Georgia!
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:19 pm
by gostangs
Looks like recent history would say the south has risen again - since the only recent butt kicking was done to the Big Ten/whatever.
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:13 pm
by Mitch McConnell
Well, whatever helps get you through the night. In the grand scheme, you can have the bowl wins. We'll take the one result that really mattered.
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:24 pm
by Dubbya
Mitch McConnell wrote:Well, whatever helps get you through the night. In the grand scheme, you can have the bowl wins. We'll take the one result that really mattered.
The one result that really mattered?
You mean Auburn moved to the Big 10.5 and nobody knew about it?
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:21 pm
by Rayburn
So, they're gonna test the division names ... TEST them?
Brilliant.
Re: Big Ten to test division names in 2011
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:40 am
by leopold
Mitch McConnell wrote:Well, whatever helps get you through the night. In the grand scheme, you can have the bowl wins. We'll take the one result that really mattered.
Look who's living in the 19th century again!
Hows that dumbwaiter treating you?