Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:22 pm
Nice to get the press, but pretty lame report.
Go Ponies!
Go Ponies!
Page 2 of 4
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:23 pm
why does TitleIX have to apply to broadcasting too?
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:23 pm
Didn't she used to write for the Orlando paper?
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:25 pm
Yes she did
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:25 pm
Dutch wrote:why does TitleIX have to apply to broadcasting too?
Everybody's just bringing in chicks these days to get guys salivating and bring more eyeballs. I'm guessing good-looking chicks, though, are slim pickins in Bristol.
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:28 pm
Raplh says an East Coast 9 is a 5 or 6 down here
Re: OFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:29 pm
ESPN stole the hottest sports anchor in the DC area in Lindsay Czarniak...she rivals erin andrews
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:29 pm
smupony94 wrote:Raplh says an East Coast 9 is a 5 or 6 down here
That appears to be spot on in this example.
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:33 pm
BRStang wrote:Dutch wrote:why does TitleIX have to apply to broadcasting too?
Everybody's just bringing in chicks these days to get guys salivating and bring more eyeballs. I'm guessing good-looking chicks, though, are slim pickins in Bristol.
don't know why they would get ugly chicks to do it.
Re: OFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:35 pm
ahhh, lindsay, I miss you...
Re: UNOFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:36 pm
smupony94 wrote:Junior wrote:smupony94 wrote:She's cute. Need her to stand up.
you're not missing much. not that cute.
I have no standards. None whatsoever
That could be used to your advantage at Red River
Re: OFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:37 pm
She made one really interesting point that's pretty hard to believe. No. 1 pass Defense but only 5* Sacks on the Year. That's a huh(?) stat.
*actually I checked and they have 7 Sacks but that still ranks only 91st in the Country.
*actually I checked and they have 7 Sacks but that still ranks only 91st in the Country.
Re: OFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:42 pm
Stallion wrote:She made one really interesting point that's pretty hard to believe. No. 1 pass Defense but only 5* Sacks on the Year. That's a huh(?) stat.
*actually I checked and they have 7 Sacks but that still ranks only 91st in the Country.
Thought she said they had 5 sacks on us last year in Championship game
Re: OFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:44 pm
yeah and then she said pass rush wasn't as good this year. That was a big part of last years game as UCF had 5 sacks and 7 hurries against Padron and SMU
Re: OFFICIAL: ESPN non-AQ Game of the Week
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:56 pm
Stallion wrote:She made one really interesting point that's pretty hard to believe. No. 1 pass Defense but only 5* Sacks on the Year. That's a huh(?) stat.
*actually I checked and they have 7 Sacks but that still ranks only 91st in the Country.
They haven't played anyone with much of an offense to speak of. Tends to pad your defensive stats.
Their opponents have a combined record of 11-18, and two of them lost to Duke. BC is awful. BYU has been ok, but best offensive performance was 29 points against SJSU. Charleston S. doesn't even have an FCS win yet.
Not saying it isn't impressive to have that much consistency, and they obviously have a good defense, but I don't think they will have the No. 1 pass defense anymore after Saturday.