Page 2 of 2
Re: SEC West will have #1, #2, and #3 in BCS
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:26 am
by huskerpony
Rankings tomorrow should be something like:
1 LSU
2 Alabama
3 Arkansas
4 VT
5 Stanford
6 Boise
7 Houston
8 Oklahoma St
9 South Carolina
10 Oregon
Craziness.
I wonder if all those Big East people who have been complaining about the new conference additions will finally shut up with two of them in the Top 10, and not a single team in the Big East now in the Top 25.
Re: SEC West will have #1, #2, and #3 in BCS
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:19 am
by NomAnor
LSU is King of the playground all bow down before mike the tiger
GEAUX TIGERS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: SEC West will have #1, #2, and #3 in BCS
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:36 am
by Kynd Tulsa Phan
huskerpony wrote:Rankings tomorrow should be something like:
1 LSU
2 Alabama
3 Arkansas
4 VT
5 Stanford
6 Boise
7 Houston
8 Oklahoma St
9 South Carolina
10 Oregon
Craziness.
I wonder if all those Big East people who have been complaining about the new conference additions will finally shut up with two of them in the Top 10, and not a single team in the Big East now in the Top 25.
So why again do those two teams need to move to the Big East if the AQ is eliminated...which it will.
Louisville Orange Bowl lulz X 1000000
Re: SEC West will have #1, #2, and #3 in BCS
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:29 am
by huskerpony
They have to join forces somewhere. I would prefer it be a combination of MWC and CUSA teams with the Big 12 leftovers when it implodes, but that isn't happening yet.
Re: SEC West will have #1, #2, and #3 in BCS
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 8:11 pm
by Junior
LSU-Bama wuld be the worst title game possible. i really don't care for 9-6 again. i don't see how you can play for a title if you can't win your conference, much less your DIVISION in your conference.
OU screwed up a lot last night. i had them penciled in if they won last night and bedlam in 2 weeks. not sure who should play LSU (assuming they win out), but i probably wouldn't watch an all-SEC West title game.