Re: our 10 commits
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:30 pm
For all those people think we can get to a BCS bowl with this type of recruiting, all I have to say is we will see.
You are probably about to get attacked by the JJ to the death supporters for that post.SoCal_Pony wrote:The only problem with that line of thinking is that when we fail to be competitive and JJ finally leaves, we are going to be left with a team almost completely devoid of the talent necessary to compete in the ever consolidating BCS world.
Back-to-Back Rivals classes ranked in the 90's is going to doom us. And for the idiots who say Rivals doesn't matter, their rankings are correlated to offers.
There you go with those facts again, shame on you!!SoCal_Pony wrote:The only problem with that line of thinking is that when we fail to be competitive and JJ finally leaves, we are going to be left with a team almost completely devoid of the talent necessary to compete in the ever consolidating BCS world.
Quantity does not always equal quality. We have also never had our first 11 commits with zero BCS offers. The is probably working hard but that does not mean they are getting BCS level players for the BE. You have to work smarter as well as harder. Busy work is not effective work most of the time. Heck, staffs that get fired that work hard but they don't bring in the high enough caliber player to win. All of the players that committed were players where SMU was a no brainer option either over no other offers or over UTSA like schools. Just sayin'.SMU21TCU10 wrote:We will be fine. We have never had this many commits this early. I think the coaching staff is working harder than ever.
As best as I can tell, the staff's strategy this year in recruiting is to recruit and offer local kids before they get other/bigger offers. Some will get another decent offer, but I don't think many of the kids already committed will.Rebel10 wrote:Quantity does not always equal quality. We have also never had our first 11 commits with zero BCS offers. The is probably working hard but that does not mean they are getting BCS level players for the BE. You have to work smarter as well as harder. Busy work is not effective work most of the time. Heck, staffs that get fired that work hard but they don't bring in the high enough caliber player to win. All of the players that committed were players where SMU was a no brainer option either over no other offers or over UTSA like schools. Just sayin'.SMU21TCU10 wrote:We will be fine. We have never had this many commits this early. I think the coaching staff is working harder than ever.
Something I thought about tooRunningStang wrote:Maybe we are going to become a basketball school....
SMU Mustangs: Three years ago, it was Missouri's Stephen Kaiser. Then California's Conner Preston came in 2011. Last year featured Arkansas' Neal Burcham. And with the 2013 class, June Jones continues his tradition of signing an intriguing out-of-state quarterback by snagging a commitment from Kolney Cassel out of Washington. Here's how the recruiting services rank SMU's class:
247 Sports: No. 34 overall class, 3 3-star commits
Rivals: No. 37, 4 3-stars
Scout: No. 62
ponyboy wrote:So do we completely discount the fact that per Rivals we're currently number two in the Big East in recruiting right now, behind only Louisville?