Page 2 of 2

SMU In Five Years: Where Will We Be?

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:21 pm
by NY Pony
Also, the school has another plan for dealing with overcrowding in Cox, raising the admissions standards next year.

Re: SMU In Five Years: Where Will We Be?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:57 am
by gostangs
i dont think they are done buidling at Lyle - thought they seem constrained by available sites now.

Re: SMU In Five Years: Where Will We Be?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:47 pm
by friarwolf
The "back side" of Cox facing the Gerald Turner Pavilion is going to get a facelift.............

SMU In Five Years: Where Will We Be?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:00 pm
by BigT3x
friarwolf wrote:The "back side" of Cox facing the Gerald Turner Pavilion is going to get a facelift.............
Anyone know why we built a temple to Gerry but still have no IPF?

Re: SMU In Five Years: Where Will We Be?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:19 pm
by PonyKai
Just gonna throw it out there, it's probably easier to turn a dirt pile construction site into a patch of grass with some marble in the middle than to build from scratch a 10-20 million dollar state of the art indoor practice facility w/ little open space that has to look aesthetically pleasing and blend in with a style of architecture. That, and I bet a donor wanted it.

Re: SMU In Five Years: Where Will We Be?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:45 pm
by MustangSTATS
It would be nice to see our research expenditures be at a more competitive level, if we want to be seen as a hub for Dallas

Re: SMU In Five Years: Where Will We Be?

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:51 pm
by Mustangs_Maroons
MustangSTATS wrote:
EastStang wrote:I think 1350 is unrealistic. After all, remember the athletes in all sports including football will bring that SAT score down to some degree. I'd prefer average SAT of 1275 and be top 25 in football.
How are these things mutually exclusive?
No, they're not. But, I personally don't get it how some folks prefer top 25 in football vs. improving ourselves academically. Last time I heard, we were an academic institution first. Kudos to you for thinking we can be both. I think we can too, and I hope the majority of alumni believe so as well.