Page 2 of 2

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:18 am
by Oliver
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.
Lol, good move for Tulsa, but that's a bit of stretch..

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:08 pm
by Kynd Tulsa Phan
CalallenStang wrote:
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?
By funding June's buyout while our boosters pay another coach
lulz

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:57 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?

The conference is basically the same. Not a whole lot of new teams coming to Ford in the next few yeas. Boise will be fun I guess but you cant really expect them to stick around long term for this.

MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.
There is absolutely no gold there. This is the best conference available.

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:00 pm
by lwjr
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?

The conference is basically the same. Not a whole lot of new teams coming to Ford in the next few yeas. Boise will be fun I guess but you cant really expect them to stick around long term for this.

MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.
There is absolutely no gold there. This is the best conference available.
Unti the NBE completely falls apart.

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:33 am
by PonySnob
Hopefully our athletic department didn't start spending any of that Big East money......

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:23 am
by SMU_Alumni11
All in all we really haven't moved sadly. I was excited last season, now I'm just worried we are in the future FCS and the winner gets to play with big boys (ACC) lol. Or be doomed to useless meaningless bowls.

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:28 am
by SMU 86
We should win at least 6 games next year imo.

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:43 am
by PurplFrawg
lwjr wrote:
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:
Kynd Tulsa Phan wrote:Can one of you guys explain how a few extra million a year is going to help SMU football, increase attendance and help the team win?

The conference is basically the same. Not a whole lot of new teams coming to Ford in the next few yeas. Boise will be fun I guess but you cant really expect them to stick around long term for this.

MWC 16 brahs. Thats where da gold is at.
There is absolutely no gold there. This is the best conference available.
Unti the NBE completely falls apart.
Careful, now...

http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basket ... a#comments

Re: Big East deal could be worth as little as $60 million pe

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:14 am
by Rebel10
Not happening Frawg.

"I still think it will take a lot for them to split away," a league source said.