PonyFans.com

Beast is better for basketball, TV contracts and media exposure.

Big East is much better. Remember that several of the current MWC members left us in the WAC after an underhanded deal to break away to form the MWC in 1999. Not so much as any forwarding or discussion on their action. They are scum bags and will do it again.

I think we ought to schedule a meeting at the Airport and not show up.

Actually, I think that we would be the ones doing it to them this time. We were at the bottom of the barrel when we were in the WAC, now we are slowly climbing back up and sit in the best market.

PoconoPony wrote:Beast is better for basketball, TV contracts and media exposure.

Yeah, those folks back East will be glued to their televisions to watch SMU-USF.
"Yo, Adrianne. Look. Da' Big East is on."

Keith Whitmire tweets:
@Keith_Whitmire: Count me as against SMU joining the MWC - IF the remaining Big East schools band together. More upside, better exposure with Big East.

And

@Keith_Whitmire: If the MWC still had BYU, Utah and TCU I would be in favor of SMU joining. People forget MWC has been picked over just like Big East.

Exactly.

In the East you have the NBE, and then the filler/wannabes in the C-USA.

In the West you have the MWC, and then the filler/wannabes in the WAC.

The money and exposure is so much better in the East I can't see how this is even a question.

DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:Exactly.

In the East you have the NBE, and then the filler/wannabes in the C-USA.

In the West you have the MWC, and then the filler/wannabes in the WAC.

The money and exposure is so much better in the East I can't see how this is even a question.

So is Boise just stupid?

mr. pony wrote:So is Boise just stupid?

I imagine the sweetheart deal the MWC gave them is more money than their football-only piece would have been from the BIG EAST so I can see where it makes sense for them.

As far as the all-sports schools (SMU, Houston, Memphis, UCF) I still don't see how the MWC even gets a thought.

NBE please.......

The answer is C, other.

We aren't budging until Maryland happens. Then everything will move.

Boise made the move to get what they could now because they aren't a player in the end game. The only reason they had interest from the BE to begin with was BCS points, and those just don't matter at all anymore.

I really haven't performed this exercise, but if you assume that more often than not, the highest rated non-aq team will come from the best football conference, then I think you want to be in that conference. Take the best remaining non-aq teams and create a conference-does that imaginary conference look more like the MWC or the BE?

I am not sure it is the Big East.

Stallion wrote:Logan Utah
Laraime, Wyoming
Ft. Collins
Reno
Fresno
Alburqueque
Boise
San Jose
Hawaii Road Trip
then
Las Vegas
San Diego
Colorado Springs
v
Dallas
Houston
New Orleans
Memphis
Philly
New York metro
Orlando
Tampa
Baltimore
Greensboro,NC (mem)

Stallion, I will take the BE but I will trade you Memphis, Baltimore and a city to be named later for Hawaii road trip and Vegas.

JasonB wrote:The answer is C, other.

We aren't budging until Maryland happens. Then everything will move.

Boise made the move to get what they could now because they aren't a player in the end game. The only reason they had interest from the BE to begin with was BCS points, and those just don't matter at all anymore.

This is the correct answer. Interesting that there is a ton of hand wringing about where SMU and Houston are going to go amongst media and others. Big East or MWC? That really speaks volumes to our relevance.

Cougar King wrote:Wait for the ACC to come and carry us away.

This. If this doesn't happen then I'd take the MWC over an incredibly weakened and unstable Big East.