Page 2 of 2
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:06 pm
by PSCA
I was not referring to Zack as the "whatever has kept him (KC), off the field" … I was referring to Wallace, Seeker, Williams etc getting in the backfield ahead of KC. KC is as skilled as any RB we had in awhile … has to be something else IMO. I don’t believe he has been in the backfield in any game yet since he arrived … all special teams I think. Players I have spoken with say he is the real deal.
I realize guys still have to earn their spot at some positions (RB being one), IMO no one will take it from Shead. If he is still the guy I saw play in HS, and one Juco game last year … Shead is the most talented back we have had in years. Shawnbrey’s quickness, Zack’s power, and Darryl Fields speed.
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:10 pm
by PSCA
Sorry ... meant Wimberly not Wallace
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:38 pm
by lwjr
Charleston Pony wrote:I could see Wimbley becoming a specialist who is used in goal line/short yardage situations.
Does JJ have these type of offensive sets?
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:26 pm
by Mustangsabu
lwjr wrote:Charleston Pony wrote:I could see Wimbley becoming a specialist who is used in goal line/short yardage situations.
Does JJ have these type of offensive sets?
If you recall, ZL was the back used in those instances when we had Shawnbrey.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:49 pm
by lwjr
Mustangsabu wrote:lwjr wrote:Charleston Pony wrote:I could see Wimbley becoming a specialist who is used in goal line/short yardage situations.
Does JJ have these type of offensive sets?
If you recall, ZL was the back used in those instances when we had Shawnbrey.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
That was to long ago for me to remember
, thanks though.
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:52 am
by Silk
Not to nitpick,and typos happen to everyone, but let's spell our guys' names right, huh? It's ZACH (with an H, not a K), and WIMBLEY (not Wimberly).
It's our opponents whose names should be butchered, because they're just not that important!
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:22 pm
by SMU89
Silk wrote:Not to nitpick,and typos happen to everyone, but let's spell our guys' names right, huh? It's ZACH (with an H, not a K), and WIMBLEY (not Wimberly).
It's our opponents whose names should be butchered, because they're just not that important!
Amen.....slik
Re: Prescott Line
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:52 pm
by ponyscott
SMU89 wrote:Silk wrote:Not to nitpick,and typos happen to everyone, but let's spell our guys' names right, huh? It's ZACH (with an H, not a K), and WIMBLEY (not Wimberly).
It's our opponents whose names should be butchered, because they're just not that important!
Amen.....slik
