Page 2 of 2

Re: AAC Football APR Scores

Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:19 pm
by PonySnob
Stallion wrote:Yes the Stallion Model = SMU Model and it only took 2 decades

My only remaining criticism was that they should hold a retirement party for 3 non-performing recruiters and pay big bucks for young recruiters like BB has. They retired the 3 Amigos but have not stepped up with the big bucks to hire stud experienced Texas recruiters
Just wait until some of the "diamond in the rough" recruits pan out...............

Re: AAC Football APR Scores

Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:50 pm
by ponyboy
Stallion wrote:Yes the Stallion Model = SMU Model and it only took 2 decades.
Then why continue hammering on a war that's been won?

Re: AAC Football APR Scores

Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:54 pm
by Rebel10
We need to get that curriculum, in place now to bring up those APR scores so that we will not get on probation for low APR scores. Bama obviously has it in place. This is more about curriculum than entrance requirement.

Re: AAC Football APR Scores

Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:44 am
by Stallion
Those kids you are planning all those remedial classes for aren't even going to be eligible for freshman eligibility in a few years. The rules are changing but too many fans are trying to solve 1980s problems rather than dealing with the new academic reality. SMU needs to plan for 2016 and not 1980. The Good news is that recruits will be substantially better prepared for college courses and schools will be substantially less likely to take a chance on marginal recruits because they will be substantial increases in eligibility and freshman eligibility with mandatory freshman redshirts for a high percentage of recruits. How many Basketball programs can afford 3-4 mandatory freshman redshirts