Re: Have we been passed up by UNT?
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:54 am
I think we would struggle against both UNT and UTSA from what I've seen so far, but it's still too early to tell how the season will play out. This next game against TCU will tell me a lot.
My biggest concern with this team is how soft we look against quality opponents, but that is in part because of the "run and shoot" or spread offense that we play. When JJ was having success at Hawaii, it was because he was spreading the field before everyone and their brother adopted that approach. His approach was viewed as somewhat of an equalizer when you had less talented players than your opponents. Ever since the death penalty, we've played with smaller, slower and less skilled guys than our former SWC foes that moved onto BCS level.
I know everyone preferred JJ to Paul Johnson at the time, because Johnson's system was "boring" and kids were going to want to play in an exciting offense, but I wonder where SMU would be if Johnson had come aboard? He's clearly a system guy, but a system that is against the grain and attracts hard nosed players who are "pesky" to face on the field. I suspect we might have had about the same degree of success, but I think we would have been a lot more competitive against the big boys.
But in response to the question that started this thread...yes, I don't think we play Georgia as tough as UNT did. I'm also not sure we could go into El Paso and beat UTEP as badly as UTSA did. And...it's probably a good thing we don't play Rice this year. Who's left...Texas State?
My biggest concern with this team is how soft we look against quality opponents, but that is in part because of the "run and shoot" or spread offense that we play. When JJ was having success at Hawaii, it was because he was spreading the field before everyone and their brother adopted that approach. His approach was viewed as somewhat of an equalizer when you had less talented players than your opponents. Ever since the death penalty, we've played with smaller, slower and less skilled guys than our former SWC foes that moved onto BCS level.
I know everyone preferred JJ to Paul Johnson at the time, because Johnson's system was "boring" and kids were going to want to play in an exciting offense, but I wonder where SMU would be if Johnson had come aboard? He's clearly a system guy, but a system that is against the grain and attracts hard nosed players who are "pesky" to face on the field. I suspect we might have had about the same degree of success, but I think we would have been a lot more competitive against the big boys.
But in response to the question that started this thread...yes, I don't think we play Georgia as tough as UNT did. I'm also not sure we could go into El Paso and beat UTEP as badly as UTSA did. And...it's probably a good thing we don't play Rice this year. Who's left...Texas State?