Page 2 of 3

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:46 pm
by PonySnob
Lebanese4Life wrote:
lwjr wrote:
Lebanese4Life wrote:we lost cause jr richardson couldn't play contain on 3rd and 25
Was JR playing his man on the line of scrimmage or was he back off off him? I could not tell.
not sure but on a 3rd and 25 id like to think he was instructed to play deep
He got beat badly on that play............

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:47 pm
by MV pony
We lost because our field goal kicker cannot consistently kick a point after.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:48 pm
by Stallion
I think we lost for 2 main reasons;

1. We were physically manhandled on both sides of the ball
2. for some damn reason SMU Coaches didn't watch the Fresno tapes and realize just how bad Rutgers secondary sucks in the secondary until well into the 2nd Half. The lights comes on and they finally aggressively attacked the defense.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:49 pm
by Grant Carter
MV pony wrote:We lost because our field goal kicker cannot consistently kick a point after.
Actually, I do not think that is a reason we lost. You will have to walk me through it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:51 pm
by LakeHighlandsPony
I think the Rutgers defense figured out of Shead was in it was a run if Line is in its a pass.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:53 pm
by lwjr
Lebanese4Life wrote:
lwjr wrote:
Lebanese4Life wrote:we lost cause jr richardson couldn't play contain on 3rd and 25
Was JR playing his man on the line of scrimmage or was he back off off him? I could not tell.
not sure but on a 3rd and 25 id like to think he was instructed to play deep
I would like to think the same

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:54 pm
by Rayburn
Stallion wrote:I think we lost for 2 main reasons;

1. We were physically manhandled on both sides of the ball
2. for some damn reason SMU Coaches didn't watch the Fresno tapes and realize just how bad Rutgers secondary sucks in the secondary until well into the 2nd Half. The lights comes on and they finally aggressively attacked the defense.
I agree.

I was surprised how heavy we went to the ground game when we could have gone vertical on them and made hay.

We were definitely were outmuscled on the line.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:58 pm
by Lebanese4Life
yenga definitely needs more PT.. he is a monster physically

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:59 pm
by mustangxc
If we have a stronger defensive line we stop those 2 4th down conversions and win the game.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:30 pm
by jimhagle
It seems the coaching staff has a hard time figuring out who should be playing on both sides of the ball i.e. Taylor,Yenga etc.on a regular basis. There are some other receivers [outside of Taylor] I think who are every bit as good or better than some of the starters but NEVER get into a game to show their wares.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:35 pm
by ALEX LIFESON
Yenga did start, in Robert Seals spot.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:06 pm
by Oldmins
They scored more points than we did.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:54 pm
by malonish
MV pony wrote:We lost because our field goal kicker cannot consistently kick a point after.
100% disagree, that was not a problem. We got the 2 pointer to make up for it but even if he made it and the one on the next TD, the score would be equal and tied for OT.

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:06 pm
by lwjr
Oldmins wrote:They scored more points than we did.
Oh, so that is how it works. Sarc...

Re: We lost because...

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:15 pm
by GiddyUp
CalallenStang wrote:Our center doesn't know when to snap the ball and our senior QB isn't savvy enough to take a safety.

That's coaching, pure and simple
thats the ballgame