Page 2 of 2
Re: Commitment
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:41 am
by Insane_Pony_Posse
footballdad wrote: view the rest of us with disdain. Probably one of the reasons they fell in love with June, two peas in a pod.
http://www.spitbloodtcu.com/2012/09/smu ... s-smu.html
Re: Commitment
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:20 pm
by Big12Mustang
I hate the frogs, but do agree that we need the facilities to be built. Not having that IPF hurts, and cannot believe a Tennis ctr takes priority over our football facilities.
Re: Commitment
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:01 pm
by PonyKai
Big12Mustang wrote:I hate the frogs, but do agree that we need the facilities to be built. Not having that IPF hurts, and cannot believe a Tennis ctr takes priority over our football facilities.
Gee I don't know why either. Oh wait, yes I do. Maybe because June complained when they proposed putting an IPF there.
Re: Commitment
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:37 pm
by footballdad
Our facilities are just fine for where we are at this point in time. Would an IPF be nice, sure, but not gonna make or break the new coach. Stadium nice, certainly don't need anything bigger with our attendance issues. Locker rooms and weight room nice. Practice fields with real grass, very nice. Campus great.
Facilities are the least of our worries.
Re: Commitment
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 5:51 pm
by lwjr
Golly gee, I am thrilled a tcu message board is so concerned with SMU's football situation.