PonyFans.com

I knew Tulsa was out...but I actually figured that Temple with their their pedigree would make it...total snub with all that love to the big conferences with their mediocre teams.../BARRRFFFFF

I think our conference has a few boots on its neck - and the boots belong to USF, UCF, UH etc. How bad they suck cost the top teams last year and it cost them this year.

Big XII is the greatest...but whipping Kansas like Temple did does not count

StallionsModelT wrote:I still have never heard a good explanation of why this "committee" does all of their work behind closed doors and not totally out in the open.

The reason I heard was that it allows committee members to speak freely without fear of fan reaction. If person #1 said "Team A is better than Team B" and/or person #2 said "Team B isn't worthy of consideration", you can bet persons 1 & 2 will be attacked by fans of Team B on social media and other forums indefinitely. Unfortunately, we know some fans would take it too far.

cockrell86 wrote:I think our conference has a few boots on its neck - and the boots belong to USF, UCF, UH etc. How bad they suck cost the top teams last year and it cost them this year.

At least Navy is football only

CA Mustang wrote:

StallionsModelT wrote:I still have never heard a good explanation of why this "committee" does all of their work behind closed doors and not totally out in the open.

The reason I heard was that it allows committee members to speak freely without fear of fan reaction. If person #1 said "Team A is better than Team B" and/or person #2 said "Team B isn't worthy of consideration", you can bet persons 1 & 2 will be attacked by fans of Team B on social media and other forums indefinitely. Unfortunately, we know some fans would take it too far.

What a bunch of effing babies if that's the rationale. The truth is that they do it this way b/c they have to answer to no one except the P5 money programs that put them in charge.

alyssa wrote:Don't Be Anti-American!

That's kinda like a T-shirt.

I like where you are heading with this...

"The NCAA is Un-American! #AmericanRising"

CA Mustang wrote:

StallionsModelT wrote:I still have never heard a good explanation of why this "committee" does all of their work behind closed doors and not totally out in the open.

The reason I heard was that it allows committee members to speak freely without fear of fan reaction. If person #1 said "Team A is better than Team B" and/or person #2 said "Team B isn't worthy of consideration", you can bet persons 1 & 2 will be attacked by fans of Team B on social media and other forums indefinitely. Unfortunately, we know some fans would take it too far.

That would be fine if you had a comittee of neutrals. As it is there is a comittee of interested parties who have an interest in increasing total numbers in their conferences. Transparency would expose the obvious deals the power 5 make with each other to keep non power 5 teams out.

Someone fill me in. I understood we didnt have representation last year because the AAC was new. But why no rep this year? And how and when does this change?

Treadway21 wrote:The fact Barns used the "eye test" to justify some of those selections. "Eye test" is a euphemism for they wanted those teams in record be damned.

Exactly right.

Also, SMU/American done no favors with early Thursday game after playing late Sunday, while others get another day - or in some cases, two days - of rest.

it is law suit time. Make all these guys take depositions.

When was it announced that SMU has the early game Thursday?

Committee chair also said that Dayton probably would have been out if UConn had won... guess they really have to protect those undeserving P5 teams like UCLA.

the answer from Scott Barnes about the eye test was just pathetic.

and UT and friggin Ol Miss - and indiana frankly

confused about Boise St