Page 2 of 3
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 12:40 pm
by Stallion
one unexpected guy who is actually making some plays is Jarvis Pruit
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 1:20 pm
by JasonB
Stallion wrote:one unexpected guy who is actually making some plays is Jarvis Pruit
And Seals. Depth at DE is much better than expected.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 1:33 pm
by ponyboy
footballdad wrote:ponyboy wrote:D line is playing great. Don't get the C+ to B- grade above. Both lines, offense and defense, are a strength for us right now. It's kind of nice to get the base solidified. And offensive skill positions are good. We just need badly to shore up the linebacker and defensive back units.
But wait, aren't these all the same horrible June recruits with few P5 offers that have no business playing D1 football?

(not an endorsement of June in any way shape or form)
Simply an endorsement of the same players who were pretty much all thrown under the bus after last season.
Kind of confused as to what your point is. Can you restate?
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 1:56 pm
by skurtn
ponyboy wrote:footballdad wrote:ponyboy wrote:D line is playing great. Don't get the C+ to B- grade above. Both lines, offense and defense, are a strength for us right now. It's kind of nice to get the base solidified. And offensive skill positions are good. We just need badly to shore up the linebacker and defensive back units.
But wait, aren't these all the same horrible June recruits with few P5 offers that have no business playing D1 football?

(not an endorsement of June in any way shape or form)
Simply an endorsement of the same players who were pretty much all thrown under the bus after last season.
Kind of confused as to what your point is. Can you restate?
Look's like he's trying to insinuate that JJ and staff recruited good D-line players; one of the things he's been criticized for.
Meaning, if they weren't good players, then they wouldn't be playing well despite being coached by CM and staff.
Personally, I don't feel last year's D had much of an opportunity to show what they were capable of when last year's O was so ineffective and unable to stay on the field.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:02 pm
by Rebel10
TCU drove the ball right down SMU's thoat on the ground on that last drive. And the RB had over 100 yards rushing I believe. I wouldn't be jumping up and down over the D line's performance yet. We still need to recruit bigger more athletic D lineman. The thing about June's recruiting is that while the JJ suck ups would jump up and down for every under the radar players that did do well there were about 5 to 10 that did not do well and it created quality depth problems. And then yoiu have the JJ preseason contingent that said were just fine for conference play. However, I think Coach Morris wants to win P5 games and not just in conference play.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:07 pm
by Rebel10
GrapevineMustang wrote:I'm quickly becoming a fan of Kyran Mitchell.
Pass the mayonnaise to go with this big plate of crow I'm eating after saying he's too small to play in college.
He probably would be a bit small to play LB but the star is a really good fit for him since it is not a linebacker position but a hybrid safety/linebacker position. TCU's rover was about the same size.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:12 pm
by footballdad
Not saying they are great, or even good, but certainly not as horrible as many labeled them last year. New schemes, new attitude, new S&C program........ and the exact same players from last years OLine & DLine seem to be performing at a much higher level. Baylor & TCU offenses going to make everybody look average/bad, but these guys will be able to hold their own with ANY team in the AAC.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:16 pm
by ponyboy
Agreed, dad.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:20 pm
by Rebel10
footballdad wrote:Not saying they are great, or even good, but certainly not as horrible as many labeled them last year. New schemes, new attitude, new S&C program........ and the exact same players from last years OLine & DLine seem to be performing at a much higher level. Baylor & TCU offenses going to make everybody look average/bad, but these guys will be able to hold their own with ANY team in the AAC.
Not disagreeing, just in my opinion we need more athletic players like Wood, Briggs and Lasecki that can hold their own in any conference. We'll get there.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:03 pm
by skurtn
Rebel10 wrote:TCU drove the ball right down SMU's thoat on the ground on that last drive. And the RB had over 100 yards rushing I believe. I wouldn't be jumping up and down over the D line's performance yet. We still need to recruit bigger more athletic D lineman. The thing about June's recruiting is that while the JJ suck ups would jump up and down for every under the radar players that did do well there were about 5 to 10 that did not do well and it created quality depth problems. And then yoiu have the JJ preseason contingent that said were just fine for conference play. However, I think Coach Morris wants to win P5 games and not just in conference play.
Oh, I agree that seeing that last drive, and how they just ran right over us in the run game was atrocious. However, I really feel our guys were wiped due to a lack of depth.
With respect to the entire run defense through out the entire game? Not sure what the issue is/was.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:04 pm
by Rebel10
That is what I was saying was lack of depth. But over the course of the entire game how many yards did Green have?
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:11 pm
by skurtn
A cursory look at the
SMU v TCU play-by-play shows more than 85% of his yards came before that final drive.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:21 pm
by Rebel10
skurtn wrote:A cursory look at the
SMU v TCU play-by-play shows more than 85% of his yards came before that final drive.
Thanks.
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 6:34 pm
by Stallion
TCU had 266 yards rushing
Aaron Green 21 carries 164 yards
Re: 2nd String LBs > 1st String LBs
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 7:42 pm
by Pony Boss
Stallion wrote:TCU had 266 yards rushing
Aaron Green 21 carries 164 yards
90 of those yards came on that last drive.