Page 2 of 2
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:43 am
by ALEX LIFESON
So proud of this team, very special group.
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:57 am
by Comet
This team is greatness. I don't even care if they lose a couple this year, they're awesome.
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:10 am
by ECMustang
Comet wrote:This team is greatness. I don't even care if they lose a couple this year, they're awesome.
Lose a couple?? Come on, guy...Get that outta here
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:07 pm
by Charleston Pony
If/when that 1st loss comes (I still can't imagine going through our back loaded murderer's row schedule without a loss or two), the goal will be to repeat as AAC regular season champions. Just trying to enjoy the ride as far as it takes us. So nice after going through so many years of cruel and unusual punishment that comes with being a Mustang fan.
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:35 pm
by RunPeruna
This might have been mentioned elsewhere, but any chance this team is immortalized in the rafters much like "the unforgettables" were at kentucky? I know that it's not exactly the same, but the fact that these players took a chance on the program in the first place, and then dealt with this is pretty special as a fan of SMU.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991%E2%8 ... tball_team
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:43 pm
by gostangs
Lets just jump to the obvious question. Is Knighthood possible? Maybe W can work that out with England.
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:01 pm
by 3rdGenPony
Could the AP still vote SMU national champions even if we do not play the tourney? Doubt it would happen, but IF we were undefeated...
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:17 pm
by MustangStealth
3rdGenPony wrote:Could the AP still vote SMU national champions even if we do not play the tourney? Doubt it would happen, but IF we were undefeated...
They are
allowed to. It would take a miracle though.
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:19 pm
by Mexmustang
I still hate Christian Laittner...
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:35 pm
by pwnyxpress
Let's just keep on keeping on and make sure this doesn't turn into an Agatha Christie novel.
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:02 pm
by 3rdGenPony
I hope they keep winning and the national buzz around this program becomes deafening! The more these sanctions and the other recent snubs of our bball team are discussed, the worse the NCAA looks....not that it will change anything. My righteous indignation grows as time goes on and the victories pile up.
Re: A then there was ONE
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 4:49 pm
by sjackson
Mexmustang wrote:I still hate Christian Laittner...
Me too!! ...and TWICE on Sundays...