Page 2 of 2

Re: Class Rankings

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:20 pm
by PonySnob
Good to hear that in 2016 it's best players on the field - regardless of classification. Plenty of JJ recruited players should be nervous.

Re: Class Rankings

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:18 am
by Puckhead48E
PonySnob wrote:Good to hear that in 2016 it's best players on the field - regardless of classification. Plenty of JJ recruited players should be nervous.
How about "this is a very impressive class whose impact should be felt on the field as they raise the bar and motivate returning players to elevate their game or be replaced." The level of JJ hate that often now seems to be redirected at players he "recruited" is really a great look, even if only perceived.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Re: Class Rankings

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:24 pm
by SoCal_Pony
Puckhead48E wrote:
PonySnob wrote:Good to hear that in 2016 it's best players on the field - regardless of classification. Plenty of JJ recruited players should be nervous.
How about "this is a very impressive class whose impact should be felt on the field as they raise the bar and motivate returning players to elevate their game or be replaced."
I prefer PonySnob's version. More succinct. Also factual, not hate.