Page 2 of 3
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:22 pm
by Terry Webster
I know that this is really strange to ask but what do we do if Shake decides not to go pro after this year?
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:32 pm
by mrydel
Terry Webster wrote:I know that this is really strange to ask but what do we do if Shake decides not to go pro after this year?
I would thank your boss and celebrate.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:52 pm
by Terry Webster
But who goes? That is too many schollies isn't it? Not that I would be complaining.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:59 pm
by mrydel
There is always room for someone to leave.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:07 pm
by Terry Webster
Cant wait till when we get back to 13 schollies.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:21 pm
by SmooBoy
And if Jank's kid enters the university next year, he can walk on.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:22 pm
by Pony_Law
If Shake by some miracle decided to stay,the most likely sacrifice would be Ray at this point. Chagois, Douglas, and Landrum all are better prospects than him, and Ray has Hunt recruited over him.
Shake is going to be a draft pick in next years draft. Once that is locked in you have to take the money and run.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:54 pm
by mrydel
I am not a basketball expert but I have seen more from Ray than I have from Landrum so far this year. No one else has said that so I guess it is just me but I would like for Ray to get more time.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:18 pm
by sadderbudweiser
Pointless discussion right now. Let’s figure out how we win conference again.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:47 pm
by The Falcon
mrydel wrote:I am not a basketball expert but I have seen more from Ray than I have from Landrum so far this year. No one else has said that so I guess it is just me but I would like for Ray to get more time.
I think you are exactly right on Ray over Landrum - mainly because of his height, which you
can't teach, and his physicality. We need the rebounding and defense more at this point.
However, the rest of the season will tell us whether that is right or not.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:51 pm
by Topper
They are Freshmen. It is December. Let's see what happens before we run anyone off.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:01 pm
by mrydel
I certainly was not advocating running anyone off. I just liked what I saw from Ray early and since his playing time has been very limited.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:19 pm
by RI Stang
Don't we still have room for all even with Shake?
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:22 pm
by edwa
We have room for one, (gu fraduates) and 2 recuits coming in, need shake to leave to have room for all. From what i know all the freshmen really like the school and are involved quite a lot socially so i doubt any would want to leave.
Re: Chargois, Emelogu and McMurray
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:25 pm
by RI Stang
OK. Let's just say these things have a way of working themselves out...