Re: 2023 commits
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2022 12:38 pm
That appears to be the trend. On the other hand, do we pick up the odd four or even five star because of a desire to skip the process and be ΓÇ£the manΓÇ¥ from day one? I think both.
Nice offer list for him.ponyboy wrote:https://247sports.com/Player/Bryson-Washington-46108959/
To be fair, that's based on the number of recruits committed more than the average rating of those guys. Colorado ranks high because they have 14 commits but their average rating is closer to ours and not on par with OU and several others ranked lower than SMU for now.ponyboy wrote:We are currently ranked #29 in the nation, two spots ahead of OU.
Good point, but if we had 7 players on the field and Oklahoma only had 3 or 4 I think we would beat them even if their individual players were a little bit better than ours based on the rankings.Charleston Pony wrote:To be fair, that's based on the number of recruits committed more than the average rating of those guys. Colorado ranks high because they have 14 commits but their average rating is closer to ours and not on par with OU and several others ranked lower than SMU for now.ponyboy wrote:We are currently ranked #29 in the nation, two spots ahead of OU.
Offers from Iowa State and Pittsburgh along with some pretty good G5 programs like App State and Coastal Carolinaponyboy wrote:And a three star Florida OL with an Iowa State offer just committed.