Page 11 of 13
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:54 pm
by smupony94
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:09 pm
by Treadway21
Very funny.
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:20 pm
by Mexmustang
All of you that believe football players and basketball players don't compare notes stand with me...NOT
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 2:09 pm
by Paladin
smupony94 wrote:http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2017/3/14/14921364/baylor-should-look-into-pre-firing-everyone
Funny, but don't show this to Baylor coach Kim Mulkey or she will serve you a fist sandwhich
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:23 pm
by Stallion
Former Baylor tight end Tre'Von Armstead was arrested Wednesday for the second time in over a week and is facing sexual assault allegations for an alleged incident that occurred in Waco, Texas, in 2013.
A Jefferson County Sheriff's Office official told ESPN that Armstead is being held at the jail there on $150,000 bond after he was arrested earlier Wednesday on a sexual assault warrant from McLennan County, Texas.
The Waco Tribune-Herald reported Wednesday night that the previously sealed indictment charges Armstead with three second-degree felony charges of sexual assault for an alleged incident that occurred in 2013, when he was still playing for the Bears. According to the newspaper, Armstead was indicted by a grand jury last week, but the indictment remained sealed until his arrest on Wednesday.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/st ... econd-week
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:00 pm
by SMUer
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:29 pm
by DanFreibergerForHeisman
Seriously though what in the hell is wrong with people these days???!
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:22 am
by Bergermeister
DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:Seriously though what in the hell is wrong with people these days???!
Cult mentality.
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:16 am
by Whitwiki Pony
15% not 25%
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:18 pm
by SMUer
Whitwiki Pony wrote:15% not 25%
Yup typo sorry
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:35 pm
by longbuzzer
Whew. Only 15%, not 25%.
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 1:04 pm
by Whitwiki Pony
I would venture to guess that is close to the national average at universities
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 5:25 pm
by footballdad
Whitwiki Pony wrote:I would venture to guess that is close to the national average at universities
Exactly. SMU no different.
And in other news.....Ukwuachu just got his conviction overturned because the prosecutor conveniently excluded texts that could show the sex was consensual. Everything isn't always what it seems:
http://www.si.com/college-football/2017 ... ion-appeal
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 10:27 pm
by peruna81
footballdad wrote:Whitwiki Pony wrote:I would venture to guess that is close to the national average at universities
Exactly. SMU no different.
And in other news.....Ukwuachu just got his conviction overturned because the prosecutor conveniently excluded texts that could show the sex was consensual. Everything isn't always what it seems:
http://www.si.com/college-football/2017 ... ion-appeal
Sometimes it isn't convenient...Nifong much?
Not even close to a Baylor apologist, but if the DA doesn't bother to check and double check the boxes, there is a competency issue, or there is intent. That can't happen in a criminal case like this one.
Re: Baylor: More shoes falling
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:10 pm
by HubbaHubba
footballdad wrote:Whitwiki Pony wrote:I would venture to guess that is close to the national average at universities
Exactly. SMU no different.
And in other news.....Ukwuachu just got his conviction overturned because the prosecutor conveniently excluded texts that could show the sex was consensual. Everything isn't always what it seems:
http://www.si.com/college-football/2017 ... ion-appeal
Not entirely true. The JUDGE did not allow SOME of the text messages between victim and friend to be introduced. It was sent back for trial and the state is challenging the appellate decision. This is far from an exoneration and appears more of a technicality. For a second my faith in Baylor as a scumpit was shaken but after a little research it has been restored.
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and ... de8cc.html