Page 15 of 22
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:30 pm
by SMU Pony Mom
Bad news bears.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:30 pm
by stc9
Wake is the smallest
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:32 pm
by Charleston Pony
Rice, Tulsa, Wake, Army & Navy all have smaller undergraduate enrollments than SMU. Duke is very close to SMU but I think we are a little smaller than them. TCU had grown to about 25% larger than SMU as has Tulane.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:38 pm
by redpony
This is the worst SMU fball I have seen in over 50+ yrs. I can only hope we make a splash hire that will bring this program back.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:38 pm
by lwjr
This is so pitiful it is comical
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:39 pm
by couch 'em
Wake 4815 undergrad
Rice 3810 undergrad
Tulsa 3174
Tulane 8352
West Point 4624 cadets
Navy 4576
Air force 4413
Academies are smallest if you count grad students
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:39 pm
by RGV Pony
redpony wrote:This is the worst SMU fball I have seen in over 50+ yrs. I can only hope we make a splash hire that will bring this program back.
Co-sign
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:41 pm
by Glenn Sosbee
Fatterson is gonna run this thing up, it's just what he does. Look for TCU to be throwing the ball late in the 4th while up 63-0. What a [deleted].
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:42 pm
by stc9
couch 'em wrote:Wake 4815 undergrad
Rice 3810 undergrad
Tulsa 3174
Tulane 8352
West Point 4624 cadets
Navy 4576
Air force 4413
Academies are smallest if you count grad students
Wake must have expanded significantly. 4 or 5 years ago they had 3,500 undergrad.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:43 pm
by ReedFrawg
Glenn Sosbee wrote:Fatterson is gonna run this thing up, it's just what he does. Look for TCU to be throwing the ball late in the 4th while up 63-0. What a [deleted].
No he will not. Very vanilla play calling all day...especially with OU next week.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:43 pm
by Arkpony
What jerk after faterson is! First string still throwing bombs with a 42-0 lead
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:43 pm
by couch 'em
RGV Pony wrote:redpony wrote:This is the worst SMU fball I have seen in over 50+ yrs. I can only hope we make a splash hire that will bring this program back.
Co-sign
per the other thread we are considering a guy who's whole resume is 8 years as a position coach and 4 years as a "co-offensive coordinator". Is that splash?
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:44 pm
by Arkpony
Yes. He is a jerk!
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:45 pm
by Glenn Sosbee
ReedFrawg wrote:Glenn Sosbee wrote:Fatterson is gonna run this thing up, it's just what he does. Look for TCU to be throwing the ball late in the 4th while up 63-0. What a [deleted].
No he will not. Very vanilla play calling all day...especially with OU next week.
What game are you watching??
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:45 pm
by gostangs
Yes - if he will work. That is all it will take. Not that tough.