Page 16 of 22
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:47 pm
by Charleston Pony
stc9 wrote:couch 'em wrote:Wake 4815 undergrad
Rice 3810 undergrad
Tulsa 3174
Tulane 8352
West Point 4624 cadets
Navy 4576
Air force 4413
Academies are smallest if you count grad students
Wake must have expanded significantly. 4 or 5 years ago they had 3,500 undergrad.
it wasn't that many years ago that SMU and TCU had similar undergraduate enrollments; several small privates are growing their enrollment and SMU would be wise to do the same
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:48 pm
by redpony
Arkpony wrote:What jerk after faterson is! First string still throwing bombs with a 42-0 lead
And it wouldn't disappoint me if a few of his players got hurt and could not play the rest of the year.
When you expose your 1st team to run the score up then you take your chances.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:49 pm
by couch 'em
Arkpony wrote:What jerk after faterson is! First string still throwing bombs with a 42-0 lead
good. The worse we lose the more June's failure stays in the news, tainting his legacy
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:50 pm
by stc9
Why didn't we let the quarter run out? Instead we run a quick incomplete pass and have to run yet another play. Morrison has to do better, be more aware than that.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:50 pm
by Arkpony
I would just like to see a field goal.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:51 pm
by gostangs
SMU has had a smaller under graduate enrollment by 2k to TCU for a long time - over ten years - probably more. It is a big reason as to why we are so much more highly ranked then they are.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:51 pm
by Frog Barrister
Arkpony wrote:What jerk after faterson is! First string still throwing bombs with a 42-0 lead
Must score more.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:52 pm
by CoxMustangFan
gostangs wrote:SMU has had a smaller under graduate enrollment by 2k to TCU for a long time - over ten years - probably more. It is a big reason as to why we are so much more highly ranked then they are.
I know this has been discussed, but are there plans to (slowly?) grow SMU's undergrad enrollment?
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:52 pm
by gostangs
Y'all will lose by 30 vs OU barrister. You are beating up on a HS team.
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:53 pm
by RGV Pony
If the roles were reversed I'd hope for the same plus that we'd go for two and onside kick
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:53 pm
by lwjr
Working to increase the points per game average. They want have much of a chance in the Big 12. Then again I wish we had their problems
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:58 pm
by mrydel
Does our extra point kicker even dress out anymore?
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:58 pm
by Frog Barrister
gostangs wrote:Y'all will lose by 30 vs OU barrister. You are beating up on a HS team.
Maybe.
Like a Massachusetts high school team?
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:58 pm
by Arkpony
How many sacks are we averaging a game?
Re: Official: SMU vs. TCU Thread
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:59 pm
by mrydel
Over 7 sacks a game I think