Page 20 of 37
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:03 am
by RI Stang
CA Mustang wrote:Both Nevada and UCLA would have more fans in Sacramento than SMU, but it won't be overwhelming. Considering fans of five other schools are there, NCAA sites don't become hostile environments.
If they are close enough to the school they certainly can be hostile - last year in Louisville it didn't impact us since they were in the other session - but the Kentucky fans completely dominated that city for the weekend. Kentucky fans are an extreme, but it's possible. Regardless, I would rather not be out West vs a Pac team if we had a choice (which we obviously don't).
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:10 am
by Harry0569
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:16 am
by smupony94
Harry0569 wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2017/02/23/ncaa-tournament-bracketology-college-basketball-march-madness-wild-night-syracuse/98292342/
7/10 game vs. VT in Tulsa; winner plays Baylor
Me likey. Easy drive for most SMU fans and then Baylor
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:18 am
by RI Stang
The revenge of Gu...
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:25 am
by mrydel
I do not pay much attention to these since they are all over the board, but this one would be great.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:38 pm
by DanFreibergerForHeisman
mrydel wrote:I do not pay much attention to these since they are all over the board, but this one would be great.
Yeah Vigina Tech then Baylor would be a good draw for sure - then the Florida/Creighton winner? Not a bad opportunity for a 7 seed which I am starting to think is pretty much our destiny at this point.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:36 am
by Harry0569
http://www.foxsports.com/college-basket ... del-0221176 seed vs. Kansas State; would play FSU in next round
per CBS Tournament Forecaster:
68-60 Win vs. Kansas State (68% win probability)
71-70 Loss vs. FSU (49% win probability)
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:49 am
by smupony94
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:53 pm
by fmced
If SMU wins rest of games, and loses in finals to Cincy, they are a 5 seed; They win the tourney, they will be a 4. Have to lose 1 of last 3, or a tourney game to non UH or Cincy to drop to 7.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:42 pm
by SMU1523
No AAC members on the committee; we are a 5 seed even if we win out.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:50 pm
by sadderbudweiser
Fraschilla says we should be a 4 seed if we win out.... including conference tourney.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:53 pm
by SMUstangs22
Should be and will be are two totally different things. Remember Cinci did not make the top 16 teams while being #11 and good wins
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:58 pm
by Stallion
We'd be lucky to get a 5 seed based on the way the NCAA will look at it. Not really NCAA bashing its just our resume does not have the bells and whistles they are going to use against us. After all-We are one of the few Top 25 teams to be kept out of the Tournament-and if we hadn't won 19 out of 20 we'd probably be on the Bubble again
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 7:28 pm
by MFFL02
sadderbudweiser wrote:Fraschilla says we should be a 4 seed if we win out.... including conference tourney.
Sure, that would be great but doubt it happens.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 7:36 pm
by DanFreibergerForHeisman
I will be shocked if we are higher than a 6 even if we win out including the conference tournament. I hope to be proven wrong of course.