CalallenStang wrote:TCU in 2001 was 6-6 and in 2004 was 5-6...they are not exactly the models of consistent winning they make themselves out to be
8 bowls in 9 years and on the verge of 4 10-win seasons in 5 years. I'll take that consistency over the next decade, especially with some of our OOC opponents (TX, Tech, LSU, Arkansas, etc.).
CalallenStang wrote:TCU in 2001 was 6-6 and in 2004 was 5-6...they are not exactly the models of consistent winning they make themselves out to be
8 bowls in 9 years and on the verge of 4 10-win seasons in 5 years. I'll take that consistency over the next decade, especially with some of our OOC opponents (TX, Tech, LSU, Arkansas, etc.).
You're preaching to the choir. And I don't care about the frying pan. One game doesn't make a season unless it's 97 and 2006 in SMU's case.
Bottom line: TCU owns SMU. ...hopefully SMU can get something started next year, if not another rebuliding job is going to start and I'll officially be done with SMU football.
Good riddance, Dcpony. I can assure you SMU football will be non the worse without you. But if you like, stick around a while and try to help the team with your support at games instead of giving them a weak ultimatum.
