PonyDoh wrote:George S. Patton wrote:PonyDoh wrote:mathman wrote:SMUtrojanFAN wrote:Does anyone think this may deter future on-the-fence recruits from committing/signing?
No
It won't hurt on the fence recruits, but it will hurt recruiting So-Cal in general, and possibly have some AAU ramifications
I'm sorry, PonyDoh. I'm not with you on this. Why do you think the NLI denied his letter? If the best we can get on the record from anyone from the Dubois family is "personal reasons", then that leads to more questions than anything else. And more suspicions.
Unless you can't move because of a death in the family where you have to be a $$ provider or the coach you signed with left, those would be the major reasons to grant the release. Nothing suggests the former has occurred. Obviously, the latter hasn't happened.
And whatever the personal reasons the NLI got must have been so flimsy, it agreed with SMU.
You have freshmen who think their stuff doesn't stink and want immediately playing time. Thus, they are babied and then immediately threatened if others like McCoy and the other kid are brought into the mix.
Even if we told Dubois that we weren't recruiting another PG, that kid should have been smart enough to figure out that Doherty's first job is to put the best team on the floor. Show me a coach who has never lied to a kid, and I'll show you a kid who has never lied to a coach.
Was another school "recruiting" Dubois? Always a chance of that.
Now, look what it's cost him? A lot. Hope he's happy with what's happened.
I'm not suggesting that we're totally blameless in this. However, I am suggesting that when matters like this, a good number of folks automatically like to get into "blame SMU" mode. I'm insulted by that attitude.
I don't think the tentacles of alleged damage in that part of the country and AAU stretch as far as you believe. Every recruiting case with every kid is different with each school he is talking with. It's up to him to decide where he wants to go -- Not his AAU coach or his father. However, those two elements can be more destructive in this process than instructive.
Jared Dubois signed a letter and needed to live up the obligations of it. But given what has happened, he just learned a lesson about life -- THE HARD WAY!!
Now, he has to live with it.
There is nothing to gain by keeping the kid locked in. His reasons for wanting out aren't important, just that he wants out. The NCAA and NLI board are rigid, anti-athlete, institutions. Their judgements are predictable and expected.
When a kids lead recruiter leaves, the procuring cause of the verbal, you let the kid go. When you recruit over the kid and he's not happy, you let him go. Again, no reason to lock him in.
Currently, this is about hurting the kid, unless there was tampering from a league school. Maybe that's the case, but this is petty. A NLI isn't a commitment to the military, or about honor. It's just a business arrangement and when the business goes bad, you part ways amicably.
Sorry, I disagree.