Page 3 of 3

Re: Do We Really Need the Word "Methodist" in our Name

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:56 pm
by RGV Pony
jtstang wrote:I'm pretty sure there's supposed to be three?


the third worked in the marketing dept

Re: Do We Really Need the Word "Methodist" in our Name

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:07 pm
by mrydel
HB Pony Dad wrote:
jtstang wrote:
ponyboy wrote:And let's just put it this way: Jesus would not have driven a BMW.

Of course not, you can't seat thirteen in a Beemer. Unless it's one fo this euro-panel-van-types. Then maybe he would?

But certainly not at SMU. Jesus would need a full size Chevy van or a party bus to get everybody on board.

Here's one question that arises for you to ponder. Do the apostles have to call shotgun or does it always go to Paul?


I think Peter gets first dibs!!!



If there is a dispute between Peter and Paul, Mary will settle it. The answer my friends is blowin' in the wind, the answer is blowin' in the wind.

Re: Do We Really Need the Word "Methodist" in our Name

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:07 pm
by Prairiepony
In 1999, I think, we played Wyoming there..........lost big, but prior to the game an SMU manager was fielding punts wearing a "Southern Methodist" sweatshirt made by Russell Athletic.........the uniforms were from Russell Athletic then. After trying to get one commercially......finally bought one from the Athletic Dept. through a contact at the Mustang Club who said........." the administration frowns on "Southern Methodist" wants only SMU or Southern Methodist University. I still have mine and have never seen another. It is white with Royal Blue (not Yale blue) letters.