PonyFans.com

yea pretty lame report...but i appreciate the press.

good job finding it harrrrrry. glad its now official too

Stallion wrote:She made one really interesting point that's pretty hard to believe. No. 1 pass Defense but only 5* Sacks on the Year. That's a huh(?) stat.

*actually I checked and they have 7 Sacks but that still ranks only 91st in the Country.

check the offenses they've played and how they stacked up against other teams. we would be #1 defense with that schedule too.

BRStang wrote:

Dutch wrote:why does TitleIX have to apply to broadcasting too?

I'm guessing good-looking chicks, though, are slim pickins in Bristol.

I grew up in CT, and slim pickins is being kind. Part of why I got the heck out of there as fast as I could.

RyanSMU98 wrote:

BRStang wrote:

Dutch wrote:why does TitleIX have to apply to broadcasting too?

I'm guessing good-looking chicks, though, are slim pickins in Bristol.

I grew up in CT, and slim pickins is being kind. Part of why I got the heck out of there as fast as I could.

I've visited New Canaan, Darien and Greenwich. Many of the women DID look like Slim Pickens.

BRStang wrote:

smupony94 wrote:Raplh says an East Coast 9 is a 5 or 6 down here

That appears to be spot on in this example.

Well, I am the greetest after all!

Am I prejudiced or does there seem to be an usually high number of women who are dreadful when it comes to job performance in college football?

One thing for sure, they all look better at closing time.

Dutch wrote:andrea adleson is an idiot.

My thought exactly.

She has facts but the analysis is whack.

Trouble on our offensive line??

Their pressure?? UCF is #91 in sacks.

Finally had a chance to listen. Sounds more like a poor audition tape. I would not hire her.

BCHIKERS2 wrote:One thing for sure, they all look better at closing time.

Beer goggles?

A third grader would have better insight than andrea. Was that filmed in her mom and dad's basement?

The PonyGrad wrote:

Dutch wrote:andrea adleson is an idiot.

My thought exactly.

She has facts but the analysis is whack.

Trouble on our offensive line??

Their pressure?? UCF is #91 in sacks.

She has facts? Not many.

The offensive line is just fine and has played pretty well.

She talked about Padron's decisions in last year's game. Show of hands: how many here think she watched that game (and took notes to remember anything)? Right. Of course not.

UCF's pass rush — as she tried to point out — is not the same this year. The fact that all-time sacks leader DE Bruce Smith (who had two against SMU last year) is gone has something to do with it.

She picked out the Darius Johnson-Josh Robinson matchup as one to watch ... except Robinson usually covers outside receivers and if she had any idea what SMU is or where Dallas is, she might know that DJ is a slot receiver.

OK some of her facts and analysis are FUBAR. But give her credit, this is THE Non AQ game of the week. She at least got that right.

Doesn't matter who is playing, I can't watch the ESPN2 morning game due to the title IX of broadcasting...


Why do they always try to deepen their voice?

Proof that ESPN hates the free market, otherwise they would have fired their entire ESPN2 college football lineup and upgraded to a bunch of chimps who are micd up.