Page 3 of 5
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:58 pm
by JayhawkPony
MustangSTATS wrote:Aren't KU and KSU tied at the hip? Not going to get into the Big10 with KSU at your side. Big East could offer both and a chance to be free of Bevo.
Very common misconception. The Regents would "prefer" for them to stay together, but they can (and will) separate if the Big 10 (or Pac) comes calling and there is only one seat.
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:00 pm
by Hoop Fan
all natty titles are bought. Did Auburn buy its title with Cam? USC with Reggie? UT with Vince? Bill Self? You bet they all did.
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:02 pm
by PonyPlayer4
JayhawkPony wrote:PonyPlayer4 wrote:How many national championships does KU have in football?
None. I'm a Pony fan too, but I really don't think SMU can be throwing stones with its bought "co-titles" and the one voted title from the 30's.
facts are facts
BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:02 pm
by ericdickerson4life
Can we just sell the state of Kansas to Canada?
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:02 pm
by smupony94
Canada said no
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:04 pm
by JayhawkPony
Hoop Fan wrote:all natty titles are bought. Did Auburn buy its title with Cam? USC with Reggie? UT with Vince? Bill Self? You bet they all did.
Bill Self dirty??? Shhhhhhhhit. Put down what you're smoking and/or drinking. He may recruit players that can't/won't qualify (which is actually only recent), but there's nothing dirty about the gamble. He runs one of the cleanest programs around.
BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:04 pm
by ericdickerson4life
What about China? They'll buy anything.
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:04 pm
by JayhawkPony
PonyPlayer4 wrote:JayhawkPony wrote:PonyPlayer4 wrote:How many national championships does KU have in football?
None. I'm a Pony fan too, but I really don't think SMU can be throwing stones with its bought "co-titles" and the one voted title from the 30's.
facts are facts
You're right, the fact is SMU has purchased titles!!!!
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:05 pm
by JayhawkPony
ericdickerson4life wrote:What about China? They'll buy anything.
Nothing to buy other than Lawrence and KC K.
BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:06 pm
by Dutch
KU to B1G is making me laugh.
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:06 pm
by smupony94
ericdickerson4life wrote:What about China? They'll buy anything.
Nah, they just bought most of south Texas.
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:09 pm
by PonyPlayer4
smupony94 wrote:ericdickerson4life wrote:What about China? They'll buy anything.
Nah, they just bought most of south Texas.
Good, they can have the valley.
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:11 pm
by smupony94
My cousin is in the oil servicing industry and says it is hilarious watching the Chinese try and communicate with the rough necks
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:11 pm
by Hoop Fan
JayhawkPony wrote:Hoop Fan wrote:all natty titles are bought. Did Auburn buy its title with Cam? USC with Reggie? UT with Vince? Bill Self? You bet they all did.
Bill Self dirty??? Shhhhhhhhit. Put down what you're smoking and/or drinking. He may recruit players that can't/won't qualify (which is actually only recent), but there's nothing dirty about the gamble. He runs one of the cleanest programs around.
you don't pull kids out of Chicago consistently like he has without playing the game. I'm an Illinois fan and I miss Self but I'm not naive nor am i giving back the champ game appearance that Weber made with Self's players.
Re: BE should invite KU and K-State
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:16 pm
by huskerpony
JayhawkPony wrote:ericdickerson4life wrote:I think they are dreaming of a B10 offer, much like Missouri.
Not a dream at all, they just have to prove they won't lose AAU like Nebraska and Syracuse.
It was votes from Big 10 schools that went against Nebraska's AAU status, so I don't think they care that much about it. If they did, they would have just had Nebraska change the law so the med school could be attached to the undergrad.