Page 3 of 3

Re: Maybe surfer dude got the hint?

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:56 pm
by SMUfiji43
If someone knows that he's leaving, just tell us. This speculation without any real evidence is pretty annoying.

Re: Maybe surfer dude got the hint?

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:45 pm
by Mitch McConnell
It certainly hasn't been dull around here off the field lately.

Re: Maybe surfer dude got the hint?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:22 am
by Lefty
SMU 86 wrote:
redpony wrote:I suspect that it will all become public after the signing date.

GO PONIES!!!


I hope Reinebold does not go because some were saying that they were okay with Palcic being hired as long as he was not replacing Reinebold. That would mean our top 2 recruiters are gone and we are replacing them with one guy who can recruit in JP and one guy who is not a very good recruiter in Palcic. Overall that would put us down one good recruiter which could hurt us for years to come.

A) Do we know that either rumor (Reinebold or Palcic) is true?
B) Do we know Palcic can't recruit? Or simply that he didn't? Could be that other coaches were assigned to recruit, while he was assigned to focus on coaching.

Maybe surfer dude got the hint?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:02 am
by goldenstang
Lefty wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:
redpony wrote:I suspect that it will all become public after the signing date.

GO PONIES!!!


I hope Reinebold does not go because some were saying that they were okay with Palcic being hired as long as he was not replacing Reinebold. That would mean our top 2 recruiters are gone and we are replacing them with one guy who can recruit in JP and one guy who is not a very good recruiter in Palcic. Overall that would put us down one good recruiter which could hurt us for years to come.

A) Do we know that either rumor (Reinebold or Palcic) is true?
B) Do we know Palcic can't recruit? Or simply that he didn't? Could be that other coaches were assigned to recruit, while he was assigned to focus on coaching.



Did you see how bad UCLA was? I promise you if that man could recruit he would have been. There wasn't a hotter coaching seat in America before the season started than UCLA. He didnt recruit and he can't recruit.

Re: Maybe surfer dude got the hint?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:28 am
by SMU 86
Lefty wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:
redpony wrote:I suspect that it will all become public after the signing date.

GO PONIES!!!


I hope Reinebold does not go because some were saying that they were okay with Palcic being hired as long as he was not replacing Reinebold. That would mean our top 2 recruiters are gone and we are replacing them with one guy who can recruit in JP and one guy who is not a very good recruiter in Palcic. Overall that would put us down one good recruiter which could hurt us for years to come.

A) Do we know that either rumor (Reinebold or Palcic) is true?
B) Do we know Palcic can't recruit? Or simply that he didn't? Could be that other coaches were assigned to recruit, while he was assigned to focus on coaching.


A) I hope Rienebold is still with us. I hope the Palcic to SMU is not true either. If both were true it would be a set back in recruiting and UCLA' o line was not that good.

B). Palcic offered players each year he was at UCLA but just did not land hardly any players, so yes he recruited. He as not like Coach Haering.


Let's just hope none of point A) is not true and then point B) will not even come into play. Because if all of point A) is true then that would be our worst case scenario. Nothing has been announced so none of it may be true and I will not believe it until it is announced.