ponyinNC wrote:If I thought they would actually listen, I would do that. I sent JJ, SO, and RGT an email when we didn't admit those 2 kids so close to the signing date a few years ago, and never got a response. I've met SO a few times, and he is a great AD, but c'mon man...is he really going to listen to John Q. Fan?
I don't know if they "listen" or not, but after the whole ASU thing I wrote an email to JJ to express my displeasure at how it went down and got a response back that acknowledged my input and reconfirmed his commitment to SMU. Whether it changed any minds or not isn't the point; I was raised that if you have a problem with someone, you take it up with them directly. He at least took the time to read it and respond, so at least I can put those feelings behind me as they have been duly expressed and acknowledged. Others who likewise feel hurt/disappointed/etc. should consider taking the opportunity if they feel it suits them to do so.
ponyinNC wrote:Sometimes I want to speak to my fellow fan and express my opinion and listen to theirs. That is why it is called a MESSAGE BOARD - so I can post and view messages from my fellow ponyfans. Positive or negative.
I completely agree with this; the very purpose of a board like this is to celebrate the successes and lament the frustrations we feel with the school and program we love. It just seems that anyone who tries to accentuate the successes is labeled a "sunshiner" and readily dismissed, while those who harp on the negative ad nauseum are considered the representative voices of the "SMU fan". To someone new out here (or to a recruit, player or parent), that is not the first impression one wants to make. This forum is a great source of knowledge about the program and its history, and allows people to interact in a variety of ways, and I would never suggest silencing or censoring one's views (not even the ones I find idiotic). But taking a second to be mindful of the impact of a post before blasting it out here for the entire world would likely do some folks some good. Are we as bad as some of the "big boy" boards? Not even close. But then again, is that really the depth to which we want to "aspire"?