Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

[Junior]

So, A&M doesn't seem too harsh. Lot of "possibilities", but nothing definite.

[Stallion]

TCU should follow its school policy period. If they don't follow their policy NCAA can get involved. From what I've gathered after reading excerpts from about 70 school policies its not unsually leniant. Also no Coach in the country will or can discuss the medical related specifics of a student athlete whose records are covered by Federal privacy HIPAA regulations. BTW before an NCAA can drug test a Student Athlete they have to sign a HIPAA autorization/disclosure agreement. This is a lot easier question than some want to make it.

[malonish]

It was posted here a two months ago, I will try and find it.


http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... g-policies

Schools of note:
TCU: (1) none; (2) "may include at least" one-year suspension; (3) dismissal.
UCLA: (1) none; (2) none; (3) one game; (4) dismissal.
Illinois: (1) none; (2) 1/12th of regular-season games; (3) 1/4th of regular season games; (4) one year.
Penn State: (1) none; (2) seven days; (3) one year; (4) dismissal.
Texas: (1) none; (2) "if suspended, length of suspension determined by athletic director;" (3) dismissal.
Texas A&M: (1) none; (2) "possible suspension;" (3) possible dismissal.

Okay, I'll grab a sandwich and get to reading.