WordUpBU wrote:gostangs wrote:wrong. i know y'all are butt hurt about them leaving for a better gig - but they had to do something when UT started trying to go Pac 10 - they did what was right for them, and I don't blame them.
Bull. A&M was included on the PAC deal! A&M rejected it in 2010. UT wasn't looking to leave A&M, A&M was looking to leave them. It wasn't where A&M was going to be left out if they had stayed as you make it seem. It's the opposite.
The fact is every legitimate concern about the LHN regarding HS games, league games, etc was all subject to B12 bylaws and dealt with before A&M left. It was pretty much a bs pr move to justify the move in case of severe political backlash.
I know someone who really knows what happened and the money involved.
1) A&M left significant money on the table to leave for the SEC;
2) A&M was tired of playing 2nd fiddle to UT - jealousy caused it;
3) A&M figured UT would be forced to "join them" in the SEC thus gaining A&M power in the relationship; and
4) A&M figured the Big XII would implode leaving them in the catbird seat.
- With the Big XII viable and stable, A&M is in a bind b/c UT won't play them in anything - ever.
- Furthermore, other Big 12 teams are standing tall with UT and won't schedule them either. Baylor and Tech know that they nearly got left holding a bag of CUSA like proportions. TCU wants to get along with everyone. In a way, A&M united the Big 12 by accident.
Basically, A&M's in state rivals are likely to be SMU, Rice or Houston going forward. Expect to see them on our BB schedule soon as they want to bring their team to Dallas (for their alums) on a regular basis. Also, I would expect they might not be opposed to keeping us on their OOC FB schedule indefinitely with a possible move to the Cotton Bowl as part of the deal.