Page 3 of 5
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:52 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
Pony4Life wrote:sbsmith wrote:I blame our inability to successfully recruit against Texas A&M etc. on a staff that has no interest in recruiting.
Not to interrupt the hate, but what a ridiculous statement.
It's ridiculous? Do we need to show you the list of our 5 star recruitment list
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:53 pm
by sbsmith
Pony4Life wrote:sbsmith wrote:I blame our inability to successfully recruit against Texas A&M etc. on a staff that has no interest in recruiting.
Not to interrupt the hate, but what a ridiculous statement.
You clearly don't follow recruiting, that's okay from what I've seen the rest of your pro-June pals don't either.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:54 pm
by mustangxc
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:mustangxc wrote:SMU_Alumni11 wrote:Can't blame the fans for having an admin for so long who was content with ghost town stadiums. We paid JJ to do everything he can to rebuild to give fans to be excited about. Lets just say if I didn't graduate from SMU I would pity this school for having a leach
That is why I said it is a combination of June Jones, the fans, and the institution.
Sorry then I agree with you, it just trifecta of allure that will lead us in a perpetual drought
I agree that we need a staff to break through ala Klemm because I know that is easier to correct than the lack of fans.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:54 pm
by ponyboy
So the standard now is anything but top five recruiting classes is recruiting failure?
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:55 pm
by mustangxc
ponyboy wrote:So the standard now is anything but top five recruiting classes is recruiting failure?
You weaken all your other statements by throwing out that kind of argument. Clearly no one expects top 5 recruiting, but we all would like to see more effort/results than we are getting on the recruiting trail.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:56 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
ponyboy wrote:So the standard now is anything but top five recruiting classes is recruiting failure?
Pretty sure we are like 100th recruiting, so if they broke the top 25 then I'd be satisfy
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:57 pm
by ponyboy
mustangxc wrote:ponyboy wrote:So the standard now is anything but top five recruiting classes is recruiting failure?
You weaken all your other statements by throwing out that kind of argument. Clearly no one expects top 5 recruiting, but we all would like to see more effort/results than we are getting on the recruiting trail.
I actually wasn't responding to you. We posted simultaneously. I was responding to 11's comment above that compared our recruiting to A&M's.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:58 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
ponyboy wrote:mustangxc wrote:ponyboy wrote:So the standard now is anything but top five recruiting classes is recruiting failure?
You weaken all your other statements by throwing out that kind of argument. Clearly no one expects top 5 recruiting, but we all would like to see more effort/results than we are getting on the recruiting trail.
I actually wasn't responding to you. We posted simultaneously. I was responding to 11's comment above that compared our recruiting to A&M's.
And I responded to you pony boy lol
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:02 pm
by ponyboy
Then you retract your statement above that the standard is "successfully recruiting against A&M." Thank you.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:03 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
ponyboy wrote:Then you retract your statement above that the standard is "successfully recruiting against A&M." Thank you.
Nah I never retract a statement
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:04 pm
by ponyboy
You might start doing that.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:06 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
ponyboy wrote:You might start doing that.
Lol are you forserious? Humor me, tell me what do you think of our recruiting, I love to hear it
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:08 pm
by Rebel10
ponyboy wrote:mustangxc wrote:ponyboy wrote:So the standard now is anything but top five recruiting classes is recruiting failure?
You weaken all your other statements by throwing out that kind of argument. Clearly no one expects top 5 recruiting, but we all would like to see more effort/results than we are getting on the recruiting trail.
I actually wasn't responding to you. We posted simultaneously. I was responding to 11's comment above that compared our recruiting to A&M's.
You still weaken your statement by saying that.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:10 pm
by ponyboy
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:ponyboy wrote:You might start doing that.
Lol are you forserious? Humor me, tell me what do you think of our recruiting, I love to hear it
Not looking good.
Re: 4 bowls in 4 years
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:11 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
ponyboy wrote:SMU_Alumni11 wrote:ponyboy wrote:You might start doing that.
Lol are you forserious? Humor me, tell me what do you think of our recruiting, I love to hear it
Not looking good.
Well then we will leave it at that