Re: Proof of a staff that's quit
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:28 pm
Winning record. 109-79 at the college level.
You hurt my feelings Stallion.Stallion wrote:It's too bad you are so [deleted] ignorant about what went on around here for 2 decades. Play your little game-show your ignorance-June Jones would not have taken the job offered to his predecessors. He's admitted it. Therefore, the performance of his predecessors is essentially irrelevant because he never played under that Model.
I'm not trying to underplay the importance of recruiting but what Stallion describes here is a deeply flawed ranking system, laughably so. Who says that there should be the same number roughly of 3 stars every year? And how do we suddenly rerank the kids? I want the biggest baddest studs playing, but I'll never buy into this star system.Stallion wrote:just checked-currently only 139 Texas High School recruits in the Class of 2014 are rated 3+ stars-so that's about half as many as in 2012 and 61 less than in 2013. They will upgrade probably back to 200
at Hawaii: 7-10 vs. BCS teams (which I would love at SMU)smusportspage wrote:Winning record. 109-79 at the college level.
Everyone mostly now is looking at the offer system not just the star system. We are severely lacking in that area.Mustangsabu wrote:I'm not trying to underplay the importance of recruiting but what Stallion describes here is a deeply flawed ranking system, laughably so. Who says that there should be the same number roughly of 3 stars every year? And how do we suddenly rerank the kids? I want the biggest baddest studs playing, but I'll never buy into this star system.Stallion wrote:just checked-currently only 139 Texas High School recruits in the Class of 2014 are rated 3+ stars-so that's about half as many as in 2012 and 61 less than in 2013. They will upgrade probably back to 200
Don't insult my friend like that.Stallion wrote:go match football wits with ponyboy