Page 3 of 3
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:17 pm
by ponyboy
mtrout wrote:Houston owns us in athletics.
You people are pathetic. We are 8-2 against Houston in basketball the last five seasons. Somebody's owning someone for sure. But their grads do a fine job of recommending the Copenhagen Long Cut two-pack special.
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:53 pm
by mtrout
We have neither a football ranking nor NCAA tournament win in the past 35 years.
Houston has had multiple top 10 football rankings, a peach bowl win, and an NCAA tournament victory.
They have a desire to win. We have a superiority complex. We won some battles but are losing the war.
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:26 pm
by ponyboy
Ok.
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:48 pm
by gostangs
mtrout wrote:Houston owns us in athletics.
Houston doesn’t own us in anything.
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 9:33 am
by PonySnob
gostangs wrote:mtrout wrote:Houston owns us in athletics.
Houston doesn’t own us in anything.
In football we are 12-21-1 against UH all time
In basketball we are 32-50 against UH all time
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:12 pm
by PonyKai
PonySnob wrote:gostangs wrote:mtrout wrote:Houston owns us in athletics.
Houston doesn’t own us in anything.
In football we are 12-21-1 against UH all time
In basketball we are 32-50 against UH all time
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
And if you remove 1988-2008?
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:35 pm
by mtrout
In football we are 10-12 against UH all time if you disregard 1989-2008.
Re: Billboards
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:44 pm
by PonySnob
PonyKai wrote:PonySnob wrote:gostangs wrote:
Houston doesn’t own us in anything.
In football we are 12-21-1 against UH all time
In basketball we are 32-50 against UH all time
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
And if you remove 1988-2008?

Re: Billboards
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:59 am
by Lebanese4Life
PonyKai wrote:
And if you remove 1988-2008?
You're attempt to make SMU look somewhat relevant is cute
Re: Billboards
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:17 am
by PonyKai
Lebanese4Life wrote:PonyKai wrote:
And if you remove 1988-2008?
You're attempt to make SMU look somewhat relevant is cute
wut?
Re: Billboards
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:30 pm
by ojaipony
The one on N 35 in Austin is really nice, but yeah I have to always point it out to my wife who commutes that corridor everyday but never sees it.
Re: Billboards
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:47 am
by PonySnob
PonySnob wrote:Love Field:

Time for a re-do