PonyFans.com

Catch the ball Cole.
I caught the covid.
Good catch.
Go mustangs.... getting to Albuquerque tonight.

MustangBroker wrote:
So I follow your logic there is no need for the vaccine if you already had covid? I wonder if that was always your opinion. I’m guessing not.

For myocarditis, my friend. Since there some citizens more worried about that than the disease. I'm playing their game since the disease itself is no biggy right? First myocarditis hit is over 7 times worse probability if you got the disease first instead of the shot. Consider the shot a myocarditis vaccine instead
Does one use math and science to mitigate risk or does one use some other motivation to "own" another?

malonish wrote:

MustangBroker wrote:
So I follow your logic there is no need for the vaccine if you already had covid? I wonder if that was always your opinion. I’m guessing not.

For myocarditis, my friend. Since there some citizens more worried about that than the disease. I'm playing their game since the disease itself is no biggy right? First myocarditis hit is over 7 times worse probability if you got the disease first instead of the shot. Consider the shot a myocarditis vaccine instead
Does one use math and science to mitigate risk or does one use some other motivation to "own" another?

Malonish, you are presenting correct scientific facts of course, but you might as well stop. Those arguing with you aren’t going to go get a (very helpful) bivalent vaccine, no matter what you say. Their risks will remain higher and their outcomes vis-a-vis vaccinated peers will be worse. Just make your peace with that; I understand they’re an unnecessary drag on the medical system and (marginally) the economy, but the harms to themselves are far greater. I’m ok with that.

Is there science to support the narrative that the MRNA vaccine has made everyone dumber?

Ready for SMU vs BYU in 60min!

mtrout wrote:Is there science to support the narrative that the MRNA vaccine has made everyone dumber?

We all got dumber before the latest round of proven helpful scientific breakthroughs. We all just have our "less dumb" areas of expertise.

Dukie wrote: Malonish, you are presenting correct scientific facts of course, but you might as well stop. Those arguing with you aren’t going to go get a (very helpful) bivalent vaccine, no matter what you say. Their risks will remain higher and their outcomes vis-a-vis vaccinated peers will be worse. Just make your peace with that; I understand they’re an unnecessary drag on the medical system and (marginally) the economy, but the harms to themselves are far greater. I’m ok with that.

Dukie: One can say they simply don't "feel" like doing things. If they want to present an invalid, inaccurate, or intellectually dishonest reason to back up their feelings then I will refute factually incorrect takes on the issue so that anyone on the fence gets the facts of the matter instead of just hearing untrue BS. It's one of my flaws.

Others: If your feelings are leading you places, you don't have to justify it by parroting lies told by the grifters on the very off brand media entities. Just say you got no clue about how it works and say it scares you. We were scared of fire, electricity, movies (people ran thinking a train was about to come through the wall), and so on. It's just a sign of the times and we'll all get through this together <3

One Trick Pony wrote:Get the jab if you want
Let’s talk football

Exactly, with all the Q level responses. Sad. Go Ponies!